Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Epistemology of Fake News

Bibliographic Data

ID20003222
AuthorsBennett Holman (0000-0001-5929-4443)
EditorsSven Bernecker (University of Cologne), Amy K Flowerree (Texas Tech University), Thomas Grundmann (0000-0002-7276-7345, University of Cologne)
Year2021
Publication date2021-05-19
Open AccessNo
TypeBOOK
VenueEpistemology of Fake News (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherOxford University PressOxford (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/oso/9780198863977.001.0001
OpenAlexW3180811763
ISBN9780198863977
LanguageEN
Citations received33

This volume consists of a series of essays on the epistemology of fake news, written by leading philosophers. The epistemology of fake news is a branch of applied epistemology, and an exercise in non-ideal epistemology. It provides insight into the nature and spread of misinformation, fake news, conspiratorial thinking, echo chambers, epistemic pathologies in the formation of public opinion, and the relation between epistemic ideals and fake news. The volume is arranged into three parts. The chapters in Part I are concerned with the meaning of ‘fake news’ and related notions such as ‘conspiracy theory’ as well as with the novelty of the phenomenon of fake news. This part also addresses the question whether ‘fake news’ and related notions can be properly used within science. Part II discusses various practices that generate fake news, promote its spread, or are purported to do so. These practices include science denialism, Google algorithms, democratic ideals, vice in experts, and unreliable echo chambers. Part III explores potential therapies for fake news. Authors’ proposals include developing the virtue of epistemic trustworthiness, abstaining from news, and developing good epistemic practices

Epistemology · Fake news · Meaning (existential) · Media studies · Misinformation · Novelty · Political science · Relation (database) · Social epistemology · Sociology · Academic Publishing and Open Access · Computer Science · Law · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Public perceptions of justification in the deadly police shootings of black men

    Briana Paige, Laquana Askew et al.•Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal…•2024

  • Epistemic Hubris

    Francesca Pongiglione•Social Epistemology•2024

  • Does the Phrase "Conspiracy Theory" Matter

    Open Access•M R X Dentith, Ginna Husting et al.•Society•2024

  • Fake news and epistemic flooding

    Open Access•Glenn Anderau•Synthese•2023

  • Fake knowledge-How

    Open Access•J Adam Carter, Jesús Navarro Reyes•The Philosophical Quarterly•2024

  • Media literacy education and teacher confidence in addressing violent extremism

    Open Access•Renee Hobbs, Kent Lenci et al.•Journal of Peace Education•2026

  • Disinformation related to the war in Ukraine

    Open Access•Michal Wenzel, Karina Stasiuk-Krajewska•Mediatization Studies•2023

  • Regarding Animals

    Open Access•Maria Eugenia Zanchet•Aufklärung journal of philosophy•2022

  • Conspiracy Theories, Resistance to Evidence, and Propaganda

    Open Access•M Giulia Napolitano•Social Epistemology•2025

  • A Quasi-Fideist Approach to QAnon

    Nicholas Smith•Social Epistemology•2022

  • The signaling function of sharing fake stories

    Open Access•Marianna B Ganapini•Mind & Language•2023

  • Beyond Belief

    Open Access•Keith Raymond Harris•Erkenntnis•2025

  • Fake news & bad science journalism

    C J Oswald, Carmen Oswald•Inquiry•2025

  • From Taqlid to Digital Ijtihad

    Open Access•Mesfer Alhayyani•Philosophies•2026

  • Post-Truth and Democracy

    Open Access•Carlos Pedro Dias, Burkhard Reis et al.•RIPS Revista de Investigaciones…•2022

  • Dimensions of conspiracy theories

    Open Access•Melina Tsapos•Philosophical Psychology•2025

  • Slander, False News, and Invective in the Works of Galen of Pergamon

    Alberto J Quiroga Puertas•Illinois Classical Studies•2025

  • Exempting Oneself from Knowing Better. Epistemic Laziness and Conspiracy Theories

    Open Access•Dominik Jarczewski•Social Epistemology•2024

  • Caveat Auditor

    Justin P Mcbrayer•Social Epistemology•2024

  • Conspiracy Theorists’ World and Genealogy

    Nader Shoaibi•Social Epistemology•2024

  • Online Illusions of Understanding

    Open Access•Jeroen De Ridder•Social Epistemology•2024

  • What's so bad about misinformation

    Open Access•Jeroen De Ridder•Inquiry•2024

  • Responding to the spread of conspiracy theories

    Nader Shoaibi•Inquiry•2025

  • Bad language makes good politics

    Adam F Gibbons•Inquiry•2026

  • Conspiratorial Narratives and Ideological Constructs in the Russia–Ukraine Conflict

    Open Access•Marino De Luca, Luigi Giungato•Genealogy•2024

  • Old Threats, New Name? Generative AI and Visual Journalism

    Open Access•Philip Matich, Tony Thomson et al.•Journalism Practice•2025

  • Style and substance on The Alex Jones Show predict InfoWars sales

    Ross Dahlke, Yunkang Yang et al.•Information Communication & Society•2026

  • Misplaced Trust in Expertise

    Michel Croce, Neri Marsili•Social Epistemology•2025

  • Liars and Trolls and Bots Online

    Open Access•Keith Raymond Harris•Philosophy & Technology•2023

  • Conspiracy Theories and Anxiety in Culture

    Open Access•Martin Palecek, Václav Hampel•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2024

  • Certainty in an Uncertain World

    Open Access•E John Russell•Critical Sociology•2024

  • Counterspeech

    Open Access•Bianca Cepollaro, Maxime Lepoutre et al.•Philosophy Compass•2023

  • Civic identity

    Rebecca M Callahan, Julieta Rico et al.•Identities•2024

Unique citing works33
Citations per year8,25
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 29
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae