The Epistemology of Fake News
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20003222 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bennett Holman (0000-0001-5929-4443) |
| Editors | Sven Bernecker (University of Cologne), Amy K Flowerree (Texas Tech University), Thomas Grundmann (0000-0002-7276-7345, University of Cologne) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Publication date | 2021-05-19 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | Epistemology of Fake News (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University PressOxford (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/oso/9780198863977.001.0001 |
| OpenAlex | W3180811763 |
| ISBN | 9780198863977 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 33 |
This volume consists of a series of essays on the epistemology of fake news, written by leading philosophers. The epistemology of fake news is a branch of applied epistemology, and an exercise in non-ideal epistemology. It provides insight into the nature and spread of misinformation, fake news, conspiratorial thinking, echo chambers, epistemic pathologies in the formation of public opinion, and the relation between epistemic ideals and fake news. The volume is arranged into three parts. The chapters in Part I are concerned with the meaning of ‘fake news’ and related notions such as ‘conspiracy theory’ as well as with the novelty of the phenomenon of fake news. This part also addresses the question whether ‘fake news’ and related notions can be properly used within science. Part II discusses various practices that generate fake news, promote its spread, or are purported to do so. These practices include science denialism, Google algorithms, democratic ideals, vice in experts, and unreliable echo chambers. Part III explores potential therapies for fake news. Authors’ proposals include developing the virtue of epistemic trustworthiness, abstaining from news, and developing good epistemic practices
Epistemology · Fake news · Meaning (existential) · Media studies · Misinformation · Novelty · Political science · Relation (database) · Social epistemology · Sociology · Academic Publishing and Open Access · Computer Science · Law · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
Public perceptions of justification in the deadly police shootings of black men
Epistemic Hubris
Does the Phrase "Conspiracy Theory" Matter
Fake news and epistemic flooding
Fake knowledge-How
Media literacy education and teacher confidence in addressing violent extremism
Disinformation related to the war in Ukraine
Regarding Animals
Conspiracy Theories, Resistance to Evidence, and Propaganda
A Quasi-Fideist Approach to QAnon
The signaling function of sharing fake stories
Beyond Belief
Fake news & bad science journalism
From Taqlid to Digital Ijtihad
Post-Truth and Democracy
Dimensions of conspiracy theories
Slander, False News, and Invective in the Works of Galen of Pergamon
Exempting Oneself from Knowing Better. Epistemic Laziness and Conspiracy Theories
Caveat Auditor
Conspiracy Theorists’ World and Genealogy
Online Illusions of Understanding
What's so bad about misinformation
Responding to the spread of conspiracy theories
Bad language makes good politics
Conspiratorial Narratives and Ideological Constructs in the Russia–Ukraine Conflict
Old Threats, New Name? Generative AI and Visual Journalism
Style and substance on The Alex Jones Show predict InfoWars sales
Misplaced Trust in Expertise
Liars and Trolls and Bots Online
Conspiracy Theories and Anxiety in Culture
Certainty in an Uncertain World
Counterspeech
Civic identity
| Unique citing works | 33 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 8,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 29 |