The Story of a Stele
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20009225 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael Keevak (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Publication date | 2008-02-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | The story of a stele (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Hong Kong University Press (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5790/hongkong/9789622098954.001.0001 |
| OpenAlex | W2269820030 |
| ISBN | 9789622098954 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 1 |
Western readers have yet to come to terms with the fact that during much of history very little was ever “known” about China. There was never any lack of information from missionaries and travelers and traders. But what kind of information was it? What kind of knowledge was obtainable via the lenses of religious intolerance, colonial ambition, or Eurocentrism? Travel accounts, Jesuit letter-books, or embassy narratives can sometimes seem comparatively dispassionate, even ethnographic, but one is repeatedly struck by a remarkable vagueness when it comes to discussions of the foreign, and such discussions become buried in a huge mélange of fact and fiction that is then collected, retold, or reintegrated in innumerable ways. The thesis of this book is that when Westerners discussed the Nestorian monument they were not really talking about China at all. The stone served as a kind of screen onto which they could project their own self-image, and this is what they were looking at, not China. The stone came to represent the empire and its history for many Western readers, but only because it was seen as a tiny bit of the West that was already there. This is the first study in English of the Western reception of the monument since its discovery in Xi'an in 1625
Aesthetics · Ancient history · Archaeology · Art · China · Colonialism · Empire · Ethnography · Eurocentrism · Linguistics · Literature · Narrative · Sociology · Vagueness · Anthropology · Chinese history and philosophy · Historical Studies of British Isles · History · Philosophy · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.36 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2024 (13) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |