Distributive Principles of Criminal Law
Who Should Be Punished, How Much?
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20030367 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paul H Robinson (0000-0001-7113-3028, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Pages | 267 |
| Publication date | 2008-09-25 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | Distributive principles of criminal law (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195365757.001.0001 |
| OpenAlex | W2485550515 |
| ISBN | 9780195365757 |
| Open Library | OL16873357M |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 14 |
This first chapter from the recently published book Mapping American Criminal Law: Variations across the 50 States documents the alternative distributive principles for criminal liability and punishment — desert, deterrence, incapacitation of the dangerous — that are officially recognized by law in each of the American states. The chapter contains two maps visually coded to display important differences: the first map shows which states have adopted desert, deterrence, or incapacitation as a distributive principle, while the second map shows which form of desert is adopted in those jurisdictions that recognize desert. Like all 38 chapters in the book, which covers a wide range of criminal issues, this first chapter also provides a commentary that puts the chapter topic in context.Also included is the frontmatter for the full volume. What the project makes clear is that for most issues it is impossible to speak of an “American rule.” There are 52 American criminal codes, each of which is significantly different in some important respects from every other. After even a brief review of the text, it becomes clear that making claims about what American criminal law does or does not do, without qualification, is likely to be misleading. American criminal law scholars ought to be humble about their mastery of their subject and qualified in the claims they make about it
Argument (complex analysis) · Criminal justice · Criminal law · Criminal liability · Criminology · Law and economics · Liability · Political science · Punishment (psychology) · Sociology · Theory of criminal justice · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Free Will and Agency · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Psychology · Social Psychology · Crime prevention · Distributive justice · Philosophy · Punishment
The framing of judgement by counter
Respeto y retribución
The public prosecution office
Parole as resentencing
How acceptable is optimal deterrence
Classical Liberal Criminal Law
Why sentence? Comparing the views of jurors, judges and the legislature on the purposes of sentencing in Victoria, Australia
The Fog Around Cost‐of‐Crime Studies May Finally Be Clearing
What do judges mean when they sentence to protect the safety of the community
Punishment and Human Dignity
Sentencing in America, 1975–2025
Prior Record Enhancements at Sentencing
The (In)Stability of Punishment Preferences
The Extent and Correlates of Public Support for Deterrence Reforms and Hot Spots Policing
| Citations per year | 1.08 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2013 - 2026 (14) |
| Highly cited | No |