Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Distributive Principles of Criminal Law

Who Should Be Punished, How Much?

Bibliographic Data

ID20030367
AuthorsPaul H Robinson (0000-0001-7113-3028, corresponding author)
Year2008
Pages267
Publication date2008-09-25
Open AccessNo
TypeBOOK
VenueDistributive principles of criminal law (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195365757.001.0001
OpenAlexW2485550515
ISBN9780195365757
Open LibraryOL16873357M
LanguageEN
Citations received14

This first chapter from the recently published book Mapping American Criminal Law: Variations across the 50 States documents the alternative distributive principles for criminal liability and punishment — desert, deterrence, incapacitation of the dangerous — that are officially recognized by law in each of the American states. The chapter contains two maps visually coded to display important differences: the first map shows which states have adopted desert, deterrence, or incapacitation as a distributive principle, while the second map shows which form of desert is adopted in those jurisdictions that recognize desert. Like all 38 chapters in the book, which covers a wide range of criminal issues, this first chapter also provides a commentary that puts the chapter topic in context.Also included is the frontmatter for the full volume. What the project makes clear is that for most issues it is impossible to speak of an “American rule.” There are 52 American criminal codes, each of which is significantly different in some important respects from every other. After even a brief review of the text, it becomes clear that making claims about what American criminal law does or does not do, without qualification, is likely to be misleading. American criminal law scholars ought to be humble about their mastery of their subject and qualified in the claims they make about it

Argument (complex analysis) · Criminal justice · Criminal law · Criminal liability · Criminology · Law and economics · Liability · Political science · Punishment (psychology) · Sociology · Theory of criminal justice · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Free Will and Agency · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Psychology · Social Psychology · Crime prevention · Distributive justice · Philosophy · Punishment

  • The framing of judgement by counter

    Xin Dai•International Journal of Speech…•2021

  • Respeto y retribución

    Open Access•Juan Pablo Mañalich Raffo, Juan Pablo Mañalich•Revista de ciencia política•2018

  • The public prosecution office

    Open Access•Massimiliano Marletta, Maurizio Caserta•Economia Politica•2026

  • Parole as resentencing

    Open Access•Netanel Dagan•European Journal of Criminology•2023

  • How acceptable is optimal deterrence

    Open Access•Michał Kłusek•International Review of Law and…•2024

  • Classical Liberal Criminal Law

    Open Access•Rachel E Barkow•The Journal of Legal Studies•2021

  • Why sentence? Comparing the views of jurors, judges and the legislature on the purposes of sentencing in Victoria, Australia

    Open Access•K Warner, Julia Davis et al.•Criminology & Criminal Justice•2017

  • The Fog Around Cost‐of‐Crime Studies May Finally Be Clearing

    Open Access•Michael Tonry•Criminology & Public Policy•2015

  • What do judges mean when they sentence to protect the safety of the community

    Ben Livings•Current Issues in Criminal Justice•2020

  • Punishment and Human Dignity

    Michael Tonry•Crime and Justice•2018

  • Sentencing in America, 1975–2025

    Michael Tonry•Crime and Justice•2013

  • Prior Record Enhancements at Sentencing

    Rhys Hester, Richard S Frase et al.•Crime and Justice•2018

  • The (In)Stability of Punishment Preferences

    Open Access•Andrzej Uhl, Justin T Pickett•The British Journal of Criminology•2025

  • The Extent and Correlates of Public Support for Deterrence Reforms and Hot Spots Policing

    Open Access•Christi Metcalfe, Justin T Pickett•Law & Society Review•2018

Citations per year1.08
Citation span2013 - 2026 (14)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae