Can reflexivity and habitus work in tandem
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20041348 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Melanie S Archer (0000-0002-4632-775X, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Pages | 135-155 |
| Publication date | 2009-12-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Conversations about reflexivity (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.4324/9780203867556-14 |
| OpenAlex | W2979377298 |
| ISBN | 9780203867556 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
There are four reasons why Critical Realists do not, in principle, have good cause to be strong defenders of ‘routine action’.First, social life in an open system is always at the mercy of contingencies so, by definition, people’s responses cannot be entirely ‘routinized’. Second, the coexistence and interplay of plural generative mechanisms often shapes the empirical situations encountered by subjects in unpredictable ways, thus requiring creative responses from them. Third, Realism’s stratified social ontology includes a stratum of emergent personal properties and powers, which include the human capacity for innovative action
Cultural capital · Habitus · Reflexivity · Social science · Sociology · Tandem · Engineering · Social Policy and Reform Studies
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2025 (14) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |