The politics of identity in archaeology

Bibliographic Data

ID20041722
AuthorsMichael Rowlands (corresponding author)
Year2020
Pages129-143
Publication date2020-04-23
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeCHAPTER
VenueSocial Construction of the Past (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.4324/9780203754412-12
OpenAlexW4254771942
ISBN9780203754412
LanguageEN
Citations received14

Archaeology suffers from a particular version of this dilemma. One of its claims is that social and personal identity depends on a secure sense of past which archaeologists produce through objective knowledge and the acceptance of its findings in the established structures of academic bureaucracy. For cultural heritage to be significant it must therefore be unifying and transcendent and be constitutive of a sense of personal and group identity. The models and theories of identity developed in archaeology share elements of both these paradigms. Nations without pasts are a contradiction in terms and archaeology has been one of the principal suppliers of the raw material for constructing pasts in modern struggles for nationhood. Archaeologists, of whatever political persuasion, are involved inevitably as producers of expert knowledges. The social construction of archaeological pasts is more than personal values getting involved in the academic enterprise. The chapter suggests has been the key value motivating archaeological work is the notion of identity employed

Aesthetics · Archaeology · Art · Identity (music) · Identity politics · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Anthropology · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies · History · Law

Tools

Open DOILibgen