Translators and Interpreters During the Opium War between Britain and China (1839-1842)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20042660 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lawrence Wang-chi Wong (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2007 |
| Pages | 41-57 |
| Publication date | 2007-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Translating and Interpreting Conflict (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Brill (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1163/9789401204385_005 |
| OpenAlex | W2123017537 |
| ISBN | 9789401204385 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
In the First Opium War, 1839-1942, the Chinese and British, with such huge cultural and language differences, had to rely heavily on a few exceptional individuals for translation and interpretation. The Chinese employed the tonshi, compradors (trade intermediaries) and merchants, some of whom were barely competent in the two languages, whilst the British recruited colonial administrators and missionaries. Some in the British camp not only collected and analyzed piecemeal materials, but also assumed active parts in shaping the course of events. The paper attempts to portray the roles played by the translators and interpreters of both parties, and the backgrounds of individuals and the position they enjoyed in their respective camp will be analyzed to determine the different attitudes that the two camps held towards translators and interpreters
Archaeology · China · Colonialism · Interpreter · Linguistics · Media studies · Opium · Sociology · Computer Science · History · Philippine History and Culture
Novice Interpreters
British Colonization and Development of Black Tea Industry in India
The role of the affective in interpreting in conflict zones
Interpreting beyond words in conflict
If an inhabitant attacks, wounds or kills a soldier, the whole village will be destroyed’
Language as a site of search for common ground and power positioning in Chinese-Finnish negotiation
Biography and the Making of Transnational Imperialism
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,54 |
| Citation span | 2013 - 2025 (13) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |