Misrepresenting SAC as Dualism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20043767 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Melanie S Archer (0000-0002-4632-775X, University of Warwick, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Pages | 101-121 |
| Publication date | 2024-03-31 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Morphogenesis Answers Its Critics (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1017/9781009405430.007 |
| OpenAlex | W4395086432 |
| ISBN | 9781009405430 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 14 |
Kemp refuses to distinguish philosophical dualism from the sociological analytical dualism of the M/M approach where two entities can be interdependent but are not inseperable. This makes him a Central Conflationist
Dualism · Epistemology · Critical Realism in Sociology · Cultural, Psychoanalytic, and Sociopolitical Reflections · Philosophy · Political and Economic history of UK and US
Decentring Regulation
Rational Choice Theory
Morphogenesis and Social Change
Reconstructing Sociology
Realist Social Theory
Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation
Making our Way through the World
The Relational Subject
Why Things Matter to People
The Economic Approach to Human Behavior
Being Human
Interests and Structure in Dualist Social Theory
Realism, Regularity and Social Explanation
Critical Realism and the Limits of Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |