Restrictive Integration Policies and the Construction of the Migrant as ‘Unwilling to Integrate’
The Case of Germany
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20046540 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Maria Kontos (0000-0002-0718-1145, Goethe University Frankfurt, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Pages | 125-142 |
| Publication date | 2014-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Contesting Integration, Engendering Migration (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan UK (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1057/9781137294005_7 |
| OpenAlex | W2468838141 |
| ISBN | 9781137294005 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 20 |
Since the middle of the last decade, the notion of ‘migrants being unwilling to integrate’ (Integrationsunwillig) - and sometimes, in a more active form, of ‘migrants refusing to integrate’ (Integrationsverweigernd) - has increasingly come into focus in migration and integration debates in Germany. Pointing to the commitment of migrants to cultural val- ues that might be contradictory to values in the receiving society — for instance, gender equality — the ‘refusal of migrants to integrate’ notion is aimed mainly at Turkish and other Muslim populations. However, as will be demonstrated below, it actually embraces the whole migrant population. Despite the nebulosity of these notions, politicians have presented quantifications of the ‘unwillingness’ of migrants to integrate ranging from 40 per cent of the migrant population, as the president of the Committee for Home Affairs of the Federal Parliament maintained (Bosbach, 2009), and 10 to 15 per cent, according to the Minister of Interior De Maiziere (Bundesweites Integrationsprogramm, 2010). Oth- ers contradicted these statistics by pointing to the figure of 98 per cent of newcomer migrants attending integration courses, thus demonstrat- ing a willingness to integrate (Bade, 2010). In line with the spirit of the neo-liberal ideology that highlights the responsibility of the individual for her/his situation and fate, this assumption emerged and stabilized within the framework of a public discourse marked by hostility towards migrants, spreading moral panic and legitimizing a more restrictive and Controlling integration policy
Hostility · Ideology · Moral panic · Parliament · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Population · Sociology · Turkish · Demography · German legal, social, and political studies · Law · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Psychology · Public Administration · Social Psychology · Sociology and Education Studies
Bildung und Arbeit als Integrationsfeld für Geflüchtete
Gender and Migration
Integration Discourses, the Purification of Gender and Interventions in Family Migrations
Transnational marriages
Depoliticizing integration through statistical indicators
Germany’s integration politics in practice
Is Germany Missing Out or Catching Up? Gender Inequality and the German Skilled Immigration Act
“Trajectory” as a Basic Theoretical Concept for Analyzing Suffering and Disorderly Social Processes
Learning for Tomorrow's World
Kognitive Figuren des autobiographischen Stegreiferzählens
The Return of Assimilation? Changing Perspectives on Immigration and its Sequels in France, Germany, and the United States
Biografische Ressourcen – ein zentrales Konzept in der biografischen Bildungs- und Arbeitsmarktforschung
Die öffentliche Dimension der Integration
Qualitative Bildungs- und Arbeitsmarktforschung
Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt
Is Europe Converging on Constitutional Patriotism? (And If So
Integration“ als Exklusion
Chinese Migration in Germany
The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action
Situated Actions and Vocabularies of Motive
Media Discourse and the New German Immigration Law
Some Reflections on Structure and Agency in Migration Theory
Injustice
The return of assimilation? Changing perspectives on immigration and its sequels in France, Germany, and the United States
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |