Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Concept of Democracy in Weber’s Political Sociology

Bibliographic Data

ID20050150
AuthorsStefan Breuer (0000-0002-6290-9725, Chalmers University of Technology, corresponding author)
Year1998
Pages1-13
Publication date1998-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeCHAPTER
VenueMax Weber, Democracy and Modernization (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan UK (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/978-1-349-26836-8_1
OpenAlexW2482531723
ISBN9781349268368
LanguageEN
Citations received12
References cited17

Two processes have shaped the political order of the modern age: bureaucratization and democratization. The political sociology of Max Weber is commonly associated only with the first of these. Its relationship to democracy, by contrast, seems ambiguous. Political scientists oriented towards natural law, such as Leo Strauss, Eric Voegelin or Robert Eden, condemn the value-relativism of his political sociology, its agnosticism or even nihilism, and conclude that it is incapable of taking a positive stance vis-à-vis democracy. Others take offence at the overemphasis on power in Weber’s theory (Aron, von Ferber), at the élitist or oligarchic understanding of politics which puts Weber close to pre-fascist élite theorists such as Mosca, Pareto or Michels (Mommsen), at the latent fascism implicit in his concept of charisma (Becker 1988) and so on. Max Weber appears as a forerunner of Carl Schmitt (Mommsen, Habermas), or as a precursor of the authoritarian and dictatorial Führerstaat (Löwith). Even those who value him for his pitiless unmasking of the illusory character of modern mass democracy and its transformation into Bonapartist Caesarism (Marcuse, Lukács) leave little doubt that they regard Weber as standing solidly on the side of the latter.1 Max Weber and democracy? Not all his interpreters, perhaps, but certainly a large number, would find ‘Max Weber contra democracy’ a more accurate title

Authoritarianism · Charisma · Democracy · Democratization · Dictatorship · Epistemology · Nihilism · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics) · Relativism · Sociology · Value (mathematics) · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Philosophy · Political Theology and Sovereignty · Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory

  • Max Weber and the Reinvention of Popular Power

    J E Green

  • The touch of the leader

    Gábor Illés, András Körösényi•Distinktion Journal of Social…•2023

  • Artificial Intelligence, Rationalization, and the Limits of Control in the Public Sector

    Open Access•Jakob Mökander, Ralph Schroeder•Social Science Computer Review•2024

  • Max Weber, demagogy and charismatic representation

    Open Access•Xavier Márquez•European Journal of Political…•2025

  • Objectivity, Political Order, and Responsibility in Max Weber’s Thought

    Maurizio Ferrera•Critical Review•2018

  • Max Weber

    Open Access•Carlos Eduardo Sell•Revista de Sociologia e Política•2010

  • Hegemony, passive revolution and the modern Prince

    Open Access•Peter D G Thomas, Peter D Thomas•Thesis Eleven•2013

  • Empirical linkages between democracy and economic growth

    Open Access•Hazar Vural Jane, Mortaza Ojaghlou•Economics & Sociology•2025

  • Max Weber's Athens

    Open Access•Can Mert Kökerer•Journal of Classical Sociology•2025

  • Interests, Values and Democracy

    Open Access•Jim Faught•Journal of Classical Sociology•2007

  • Max Weber and Carl Schmitt on Legitimate Domination

    Open Access•Can Mert Kökerer•Critical Sociology•2025

  • Building on Weber to Understand Governance

    Open Access•Philip A Woods•Sociology•2003

  • New World Disorder

    Ken Jowitt•New World Disorder•1992

  • The Failure of Presidential Democracy

    Juan J Linz, Arturo Valenzuela et al.•The Failure of Presidential…•1994

  • The personal president

    Theodore J Lowi•The personal president•1985

  • The Political System of Napoleon III

    David H Pinkney, Theodore Zeldin•The American Historical Review•1959

  • Bandidos

    E J Hobsbawm, Richard W Slatta•Hispanic American Historical Review•1988

  • Demokratie in Deutschland

    M Rainer Lepsius•Demokratie in Deutschland•1993

  • Political parties in Western democracies

    David Childs•International Affairs•1986

  • Max Webers Herrschaftssoziologie

    Stefan Breuer•Zeitschrift für Soziologie•1988

  • Latin America

    Open Access•Arturo Valenzuela•Journal of democracy•1993

  • The Ritual Process. Structure and Anti-Structure

    F B Welbourn, Victor Turner et al.•Journal of Religion in Africa•1971

  • Demokratie und Regierungsformen in Südamerika

    Open Access•Nikolaus Werz•Verfassung in Recht und Übersee•1987

  • Presidentialism in Latin America

    Open Access•Scott Mainwaring•Latin American Research Review•1990

  • From Ritual to Theatre

    A Theodore Kachel, Victor Turner et al.•Journal for the Scientific Study…•1983

  • Caudillo Politics

    Open Access•Eric R Wolf, Edward C Hansen•Comparative Studies in Society…•1967

Unique citing works12
Citations per year0,52
Citation span2003 - 2025 (23)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 12
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae