Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Double standards

Bibliographic Data

ID20051078
AuthorsM Strathern (0000-0003-2004-1902, corresponding author)
Year2005
Pages139-164
Publication date2005-08-02
Open AccessNo
TypeCHAPTER
VenueEthnography of Moralities (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.4324/9780203974193-14
OpenAlexW4246352306
ISBN9780203974193
LanguageEN
References cited1

If feminists have criticized the double standards by which men and women are privileged in relation to the power of the law, Smart suggests that the criticism deploys double standards itself-bringing the richness and diversity of knowledge about women’s experience to bear on what is construed as monolithic orthodoxy. The charge is not so dissimilar from that often brought against anthropologists who pit their nuanced understandings of local knowledge against monolithic readings of Euro-American conventions. I would only add that double standards may serve political purposes. Depicting the law as operating according to its claim to neutrality affords a single position that can be attacked from another single position-feminist jurisprudence can rally round a common target. The kind of complexity to which Smart refers makes the task of social criticism much more diffuse. If this is true of the fleld of jurisprudence, no doubt it is also true of questions about morality

Environmental Science · Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues · Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies · Geology

  • Retaining Reality

    Debbora Battaglia•Man•1994

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOILibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae