Some Ironies and Anomalies in the History of Subaltern Studies
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20055662 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dipesh Chakrabarty (0000-0003-0637-644X, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Pages | 60-63 |
| Publication date | 2025-04-24 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | The Routledge Handbook of Subalterns across History (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.4324/9781003441434-4 |
| OpenAlex | W4409776242 |
| ISBN | 9781003441434 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
This chapter reminisces about the historical period and the fervent, debates and political processes that gave shape to Subaltern Studies in the early 1980s. It comments on the significance acquired by peasants in 1970s, particularly among Left ideologues and intellectuals. Here, peasants were rendered as an identifiable social group whose political potential was expected to occasion revolutions leading non-capitalist futures, and links it with the choice of the peasant as the paradigmatic subaltern. Chakrabarty reflects on the transition in Subaltern Studies from an important intervention in colonial and national(ist) history and historiography into global, postcolonial-global “studies” (instead of “discipline”) from the 1990s in tune with changing socio-political circumstances and academic imperatives
Geography · Political science · Subaltern · Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies · Geology · History · Law · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |