Depopulating the Novel
Post-Catastrophe Fiction, Scale, and the Population Unconscious
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20057585 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Pieter Vermeulen (0000-0003-1992-1646, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Pages | 229-258 |
| Publication date | 2022-10-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Life, Re-Scaled (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Open Book Publishers (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.11647/obp.0303.09 |
| OpenAlex | W4304184154 |
| ISBN | 9781800647497 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 157 |
Contemporary post-catastrophe fiction typically focuses on a small group of survivors, conveniently getting rid of excess populations by environmental disasters or pandemics. This essay argues that the failure to address the issue of (over)population constitutes an important limitation of these fictions’ capacity to address contemporary social and environmental challenges, as they avoid the question of whether the life forms they imagine are scalable. By situating contemporary post-catastrophe fiction in the longer histories of utopian fiction (which traditionally brackets the problem of scalability), science fiction (where anxieties over over- or depopulation are confronted through the genre’s defining spatiotemporal displacements), and the Victorian novel (which negotiates the pressures that growing populations put on political and aesthetic forms), this essay shows how these fictions engage with the uncertain and contested place of population discourse in contemporary ecological thought
Aesthetics · Art · Environmental ethics · Political science · Politics · Population · Sociology · Contemporary Literature and Criticism · Demography · Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature · History · Law · Philosophy · Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
Climate and the Making of Worlds
Picturing Personhood
Towards a 'Natural' Narratology
Affective Neuroscience
How We Became Posthuman
The Order of Forms
Imagining Extinction
Dark Ecology
Strange Encounters
Neuromarketing
Seeing is believing
Materialism and Qualia
Fertility, mortality, migration, and population scenarios for 195 countries and territories from 2017 to 2100
The Promise of Disaster
L’illisibilité du paysage
Darwin's Plots
Biopolitical Futures in Twenty-First-Century Speculative Fiction
Regulating Aversion
Black-Light Ecologies
Anthropo-Scenes
Improper Life
Narratives of Scale in the Anthropocene
Petrocultures
Extraterritorial
The Future as Catastrophe
Stages of Transmutation
Characterization of Natural Products on Native American Archaeological and Ethnographic Materials From the Great Basin Region, U.S.A
Ariel's Ecology
The Ecological Thought
From Counterculture to Cyberculture
Sounding the Limits of Life
The Great Derangement
Weird
‘But the real problem is….’
Climate change as a ‘hyperobject’
Stuplimity
Our Cancer Year , and
How Do You Know Unless You Look?”
I See What You Are Saying
Radical Botany
Sources of mummy bitumen in ancient Egypt and Palestine
Narratology beyond the Human
Beyond Ecophilia
A Twisted, Looping Form
Land of hope and glory
Scale Critique for the Anthropocene
Poetry and the Anthropocene
Worm Work
Sense of Place and Sense of Planet
Meeting the Universe Halfway
Living Oil
Jean-Luc Marion, The Crossing of the Visible
Ustopian Breakfasts
Resilient Evil
Introduction
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Ontological Terror
Abyssal intimacies and temporalities of care
Worlds Without Us
Population in Literature
Atmosphere as the Fundamental Concept of a New Aesthetics
Too many bodies? The return and disavowal of the population question
Model Thinking
Giving depth to the surface
Demodystopias
Neurochemical selves
Mama's Baby, Papa's Maybe
Unsettling the Coloniality of Being/Power/Truth/Freedom
The Mushroom at the End of the World
Situated Knowledges
Do Rocks Listen
Cosmoecological Sheep and the Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet
The myth of isolates
Anthropogenesis
Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |