Cocksure Women and Hensure Men
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20060361 |
|---|---|
| Editors | Angela Howard (0000-0003-0841-4921), Sasha Ranaé Adams Tarrant |
| Year | 2019 |
| Pages | 115-118 |
| Publication date | 2019-06-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Redefining the New Woman, 1920-1963 (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.4324/9781315051994-22 |
| OpenAlex | W3131692113 |
| ISBN | 9781315051994 |
| Language | EN |
With the two kinds of femininity go two kinds of confidence: there are the women who are cocksure, and the women who are hensure. A really up-to-date woman is a cocksure woman. Only all the cocks are cackling and pretending to lay eggs, and all the hens are crowing and pretending to call the sun out of bed. If women are cocksure, men are hensure. Men are timid, tremulous, rather soft and submissive, easy in their very henlike tremulousness. The tragedy about cocksure women is that they are more cocky, in their assurance, than the cock himself. They never realise that when the cock gives his loud crow in the morning, he listens acutely afterwards, to hear if some other wretch of a cock dare crow defiance, challenge. To the cock, there is always defiance, challenge, danger and death on the clear air; or the possibility thereof
Anthropological Studies and Insights · Colonialism, slavery, and trade · Diversity and Impact of Dance · Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |