Capitalismes asiatiques et puissance chinoise
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20061544 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ruth Boyer (0000-0003-0425-7439, École des hautes études en sciences sociales, corresponding author), Robert Boyer |
| Year | 2014 |
| Pages | 53-92 |
| Publication date | 2014-10-16 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Capitalismes asiatiques et puissance chinoise (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Presses de Sciences Po (PUBLISHER • FR) |
| DOI | 10.3917/scpo.alary.2014.01.0053 |
| OpenAlex | W4240697525 |
| ISBN | 9782724616200 |
| Language | FR |
| References cited | 12 |
The rise of East Asian countries not only adds an episode to the history of capitalism, it implies also an aggiornamento of development theories and most other social sciences. Japan is the first to explore the hybridization of mass production with its specific social relations, but it also shows the danger of idealization of a “model”, whose very success has led to a crisis and long period of stagnation. The geographical proximity of the East Asian economies does not mean the identity of their forms of capitalism, as evidenced by for instance by Korea and contemporary China. Finally, the strong dependence of the international position of China in relation to its domestic growth pattern puts into perspective the assumption that this country is expected to replace the United States in the role of hegemon : it should rather be anticipated a multipolar world full of contradictions and imbalances, especially those generated by the transformation of the Chinese socio-economic system
Capitalism · China · Development economics · East Asia · Economic geography · Economic system · Economics · Economy · Geography · Hegemony · Idealization · Political science · Asian Industrial and Economic Development · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Philosophy · Political and Social Issues
| Highly cited | No |
|---|