Chapter Two. De memoria et reminiscentia
Text and translation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20067585 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bloch Bloch (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2007 |
| Pages | 23-51 |
| Publication date | 2007-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Aristotle on memory and recollection (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Brill (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1163/ej.9789004160460.i-276.12 |
| OpenAlex | W231924983 |
| ISBN | 9789004160460 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
This chapter is divided into two parts. The first part is on memory and recollection and the second part is on which of the parts in us it belongs. Memory is of the past; and nobody would claim to remember the present, when it is actually present. Memory is not produced simultaneously with the affection that is produced in the person. In general, one might say that the Latin medieval concepts of memory evolved through the schoolmen's efforts to interpret and harmonise the theories of different philosophical authorities, and that this produced new and interesting theories.Keywords: De Memoria Et Reminiscentia; soul
Affection · Cognitive psychology · Cognitive science · Epistemology · nobody · Recall · Soul · Classical Antiquity Studies · Computer Science · Medieval Literature and History · Philosophy · Psychology · Religious, Philosophical, and Educational Studies · Social Psychology
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.22 |
| Citation span | 2008 - 2022 (15) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |