Mining the Early Published Sources
Problems and pitfalls
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20069057 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anne Laidlaw (0000-0003-1214-4100, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Pages | 662-674 |
| Publication date | 2009-06-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | World of Pompeii (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.4324/9780203866191-51 |
| OpenAlex | W2952047492 |
| ISBN | 9780203866191 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
The literature on Pompeii is not only vast, but complicated by the fact that Pompeiiand its sister cities are the earliest continuously excavated Roman sites that exist. Thus, the most important adjunct to any study of Pompeii is access to a good Classical library, and for the eighteenth-and nineteenth-century publications, especially the periodicals and illustrated folios, these are difficult if not impossible to find in the United States.1 In deciphering the early published accounts, a knowledge of the modern social and political history of southern Italy is also necessary, since the vicissitudes of the newly re-established Bourbon Kingdom of the Two Sicilies and its familial interrelationships with the Austro-Hungarian Empire, with France and England during the Napoleonic Wars, and later, when the Italians were struggling to throw off the Bourbon rule to establish the Kingdom of Italy, often were decisive elements in what was published where, by whom, and with what purpose.2
Classical Antiquity Studies · Computer Science · Environmental Science · Historical and Literary Studies · Historical Architecture and Urbanism · History
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2011 - 2025 (15) |
| Highly cited | No |