The case for continuity of human occupation and rock art production in the Kimberley, Australia

Bibliographic Data

ID20072945
AuthorsP Veth (0000-0002-1717-6390), Sam Harper (0000-0002-1590-2387), Kane Ditchfield (0000-0002-9555-4393), Sven Ouzman (0000-0002-9379-2996), Balanggarra Aboriginal
Year2021
Pages194-220
Publication date2021-08-19
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeCHAPTER
VenueRoutledge Companion to Global Indigenous History (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.4324/9781315181929-10
OpenAlexW3194811526
ISBN9781315181929
LanguageEN
Citations received4

The Kimberley region hosts a large body of figurative and non-figurative rock art, which we argue has changed through time as people have utilised it to interact with social and environmental changes. While the dating of this art is still nascent, preliminary evidence shows that some of the Kimberley’s earliest rock art dates to the terminal Pleistocene. This early art includes cupules as well as naturalistic animal, human, and plant figures. We focus on the continuity of these figurative motif types across styles, as matched to the occupation of archaeological sites and landscapes through time. We present a revised framework for relating style phases to changing social organisation, landscapes, and environments. This framework relies on new dates for rock art and archaeological data sets, as well as improved palaeoclimatic and sea level data. The relationship is explained by deploying a combination of Information Exchange and Group Boundary Formation Theory. This approach allows us plausibly to link changes in art, human occupation, and palaeo-environmental records at longer millennia-increment time scales

Archaeology · Earth science · Economics · Geography · Archaeology and Rock Art Studies · Evolution and Paleontology Studies · History · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology · Geology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access