Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Anti-Science and Organic Daydreams

Bibliographic Data

ID20077063
AuthorsRaymond Tallis (University of Manchester, corresponding author)
Year1995
Pages55-67
Publication date1995-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeCHAPTER
VenueNewton's Sleep (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan UK (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1057/9780230379244_5
OpenAlexW2485046849
ISBN9780230379244
LanguageEN
References cited3

For many of those who find science distasteful, the question of whether or not it is of net material benefit to mankind is irrelevant. Science is condemned precisely insofar as it is preoccupied with meeting material needs and wants, and (to use Bacon’s terms) its ‘experiments of use’ outnumber its ‘experiments of light’. Worse, the successes of science have encouraged scientists — and many others in the centuries dominated by science-based technology — to believe in progress. Progress, however, is an illusion: technology has not commuted the common sentence of mortality nor has it brought a definitive understanding of the universe, even less of our place in it. So the scientists’ optimism — even their commitment to improving the world — is condemned as ‘shallow’. Technological advances, however impressive, do not solve the tragedy of the human condition, they merely blunt our perception of it

Cognitive psychology · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Illusion · Linguistics · Optimism · Perception · Political science · Sentence · Social science · Sociology · Tragedy (event) · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Philosophy · Psychology

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOILibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae