On ‘Life-Enhancing’ Technologies and the Democratic Discourse
A South Asian Perspective
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20088220 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Shiv Visvanathan (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Pages | 54-62 |
| Publication date | 2012-05-04 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Unnatural Selection (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.4324/9781849773669-13 |
| OpenAlex | W4252017780 |
| ISBN | 9781849773669 |
| Language | EN |
Karl Mannheim, in one of his Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge (Mannheim, 1952), wrote about two cultural ways of approaching a problem. He observed that when one mentioned the word ‘problem’ to a European, he treated it as a riddle, an exercise in metaphysics, a question that you unravel again and again, whereas when one suggested the same word to an American, he reached for his toolbox. For him, a problem was something that needed a technological solution. These two perspectives get repeated in the literature. In the debate on life-enhancing technologies, one senses a tension between an America at one end, bristling with technological promise, and a UK/Europe seeded with philosophical doubt. Any third group, with, say, a South Asian or African perspective, needs to add a different view to the debate
Art · Democracy · Environmental ethics · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Visual arts · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Digital Education and Society · Law · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|