Materiality, Sociomateriality, and Socio-Technical Systems

What Do These Terms Mean? How Are They Different? Do We Need Them

Datos Bibliográficos

ID20089340
AutoresPaul M Leonardi (0000-0003-0929-8731, autor de correspondencia)
Año2012
Páginas24-48
Fecha de publicación2012-11-22
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoCHAPTER
RevistaMateriality and organizing (SOURCE_BOOK)
EditorialOxford University PressOxford (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664054.003.0002
OpenAlexW4250860079
ISBN9780199664054
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas82
Referencias citadas52

This chapter reviews the history of three terms increasingly used by researchers in the fields of organization studies and information systems: “materiality,” “sociomateriality,” and “socio-technical systems.” After this review, the chapter explores ways in which these terms overlap and depart in meaning from one another in scholars' writings. The chapter suggests that materiality might be viewed as a concept that refers to properties of a technology that transcend space and time, while sociomateriality may be used to refer to the collective spaces in which people come into contact with the materiality of an artifact and produce various functions. The chapter suggests that the concept of a sociomaterial practice is akin to what socio-technical systems theorists refer to as the “technical subsystem” of an organization, or the way that people's tasks shape and are shaped by their use of machines. This technical subsystem is recursively organized alongside the social subsystem of an organization, which is characterized by an abstract set of roles, communication patterns, and so on

Aesthetics · Epistemology · Knowledge management · Sociology · Sociotechnical system · Complex Systems and Decision Making · Computer Science · Information Systems Theories and Implementation · Management and Organizational Studies · Philosophy · Artificial Intelligence