Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Governing Through Criminal Selectivity and Lawfare

Non‐Democratic Politics to Entrench Authoritarian Populist Imagination

Bibliographic Data

ID20109119
AuthorsErman Örsan Yetiş (0000-0001-7088-8138, School of Sociological Studies, Politics and International Relations The University of Sheffield Sheffield UK, corresponding author)
Year2026
Publication date2026-05-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Social Science Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-8701 • E-ISSN: 1468-2451
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/issj.70054
OpenAlexW7161969637
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited27

Across much of the Global South and increasingly in the Global North, authoritarian populist imagination blurs boundaries between legality and illegality, weaponising law to suppress dissent while tolerating violence by allied actors. This imagination establishes a symbolic boundary mechanism between punitive/eliminative violence for political dissidents and marginalised groups, and the impunity of violence for privileged groups aligned with incumbent political power. Non‐democratic politics in Turkey demonstrate how the incumbent regime's shifting sense of power due to declining popular support translates into more explicitly coercive strategies and the masculinist entrenchment of authoritarian populist imagination. Criminal selectivity and lawfare are utilised for this purpose; however, their effectiveness is underpinned by cultural intimacies that reflect the cultural and political processes of negotiation and recognition between the top‐down majoritarian–authoritarian–securitarian political agenda and its bottom‐up receptions. Cultural intimacies rooted in masculinist entrenchment involve both the enactment of familial codes as a cultural template for the masculinist protection of the family, state and nation, and the performance of swashbuckling masculinity as a cultural script for righteous aggression against targeted groups. Both reframe the mechanism of criminal selectivity and lawfare, reinforcing the incumbent regime's authoritarian populist imagination by constantly presenting itself as an indispensable and invincible ruling actor

Authoritarianism · Cognitive reframing · Contentious politics · Impunity · Negotiation · Political dissent · Politics · Power (physics) · Political Conflict and Governance · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Turkey's Politics and Society

  • Resisting in times of crisis

    Open Access•Itır Aladağ Görentaş, Pelin Sönmez•Journal of Gender Studies•2026

  • Lawfare

    Raul Zaffaroni, Cristina Caamaño et al.•Lawfare•2023

  • Turkey’s Judiciary and the Drift Toward Competitive Authoritarianism

    Ergun Ozbudun•The International Spectator•2015

  • Pro-state paramilitary violence in Turkey since the 1990s

    Open Access•Ayhan Işık•Journal of Southeast European and…•2021

  • Existential insecurity and the making of a weak authoritarian regime in Turkey

    Karabekir Akkoyunlu, Kerem Öktem•Journal of Southeast European and…•2016

  • Taking the matter into your own hands

    Erol Saglam•Journal of Southeast European and…•2021

  • Cultural Intimacy

    Michael Herzfeld•Cultural Intimacy•2016

  • Relocating gendered violence and anti-genderism within authoritarian populist imagination in Turkey

    Open Access•Erman Örsan Yetiş•Frontiers in Political Science•2025

  • Turkey’s Evolving Political Terrain

    Eyal Aviv•The Journal of the Middle East…•2024

  • Understanding the moral economy of state-civil society relationships

    Open Access•Nazlı Kazanoğlu, Markus Ketola•Turkish Studies•2022

  • Proliferation of neopatrimonial domination in Turkey

    Fatih Çağatay Cengiz•British Journal of Middle Eastern…•2018

  • Navigating Masculinities

    Open Access•Erman Örsan Yetiş•The Journal of Men s Studies•2026

  • Anti-genderism in Turkey

    Open Access•Erman Örsan Yetiş, Ozge Ozduzen•Women s Studies International Forum•2024

  • The ‘competitive authoritarian’ turn in Turkey

    Düzgün Arslantaş, Andrea Kaiser•Third World Quarterly•2023

  • Turkey – from tutelary to delegative democracy

    Hakkı Taş•Third World Quarterly•2015

  • Ruling through exception

    Barış Çağlar•Third World Quarterly•2025

  • Beyond authoritarian populist imagination

    Erman Örsan Yetiş•Journal of Psychosocial Studies•2025

  • Competition in a Populist Authoritarian Regime

    Yunus Sözen•South European Society & Politics•2019

  • How Authoritarians Win When They Lose

    Open Access•Sultan Tepe, Ayça Alemdaroğlu•Journal of democracy•2021

  • The Spirit of Ultra-Realism

    Open Access•Kevin F Steinmetz, Edward L W Green•Critical Criminology•2024

  • The Concept of the Political

    Carl Schmitt, George Schwab et al.•The concept of the political•2007

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae