Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

New Challenges and Old Concepts

Understanding 21st Century Insurgency

Bibliographic Data

ID20138307
AuthorsSteven Metz (United States Army War College, corresponding author)
Year2011
Volume41
Issue4
Publication date2011-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe US Army War College Quarterly Parameters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-1723 • E-ISSN: 0031-1723
PublisherUnited States Army War College Press (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.55540/0031-1723.2612
OpenAlexW4292551492
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited6

F rom the 1960s to the 1980s stopping Communist-backed insurgents was an important part of American strategy, so counterinsurgency was an important mission for the US military, particularly the Army. Even when most of the Army turned its attention to large-scale warfighting and the operational art following Vietnam, special operation forces preserved some degree of capability. In the 1980s American involvement in El Salvador and a spate of insurgencies around the world linked to the Soviets and Chinese sparked renewed interest in counterinsurgency operations (as a component of low-intensity conflict). By 1990 what could be called the El Salvador model of counterinsurgency, based on a limited US military footprint in conjunction with the strengthening of local security forces, became codified in strategy and doctrine. 1 Interest then faded. Policymakers, military leaders, and defense experts assumed that insurgency was a relic of the Cold War, posing little challenge in the "new world order." With the demise of the Soviet Union and the mellowing of China, insurgency-even though it persisted in the far corners of the worldwas not viewed as a strategic challenge to the world's sole superpower. With American involvement in Somalia, Bosnia, Kosovo, and Haiti, multinational peacekeeping-a previously unimportant role for the military-moved to the fore. In a burst of energy, the military revamped its peacekeeping doctrine and concepts. Professional military education and training shifted to accommodate these missions. Wargames, conferences, and seminars proliferated. Counterinsurgency was forgotten by all but a tiny handful of scholars

Insurgency · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · Law

  • Article Index, Vol. XXXVII, 2007

    Parameters Editors•The US Army War College Quarterly…•2007

  • Coin in the Real World

    David R Haines•The US Army War College Quarterly…•2008

  • Article Index, Vol. XLI, 2011

    Parameters Editors•The US Army War College Quarterly…•2011

  • Contracting out Support Services in Future Expeditionary Operations

    Open Access•C Kinsey, Mark Erbel•Journal of Contemporary European…•2011

  • Estrategia de la Resistencia. Contrainsurgencia posmoderna

    Open Access•Luis Andrés Bárcenas Medina•Araucaria•2020

  • Incentives and Disincentives for Violence

    David Keen•Greed and Grievance•2000

  • Doing Well out of War

    Paul Collier•Greed and Grievance•2000

  • Greed and grievance in civil war

    Paul Collier•Oxford Economic Papers•2004

  • Violence and Economic Agendas in Civil Wars

    Open Access•Mats Berdal, David Keen•Millennium Journal of International…•1997

  • Neotrusteeship and the Problem of Weak States

    James D Fearon, David D Laitin•International Security•2004

  • Things come together

    Gordon H Mccormick, Frank Giordano et al.•Third World Quarterly•2007

Unique citing works5
Citations per year0.26
Citation span2007 - 2020 (14)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae