The Coercive Logic of Militant Drone Use
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20138529 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Austin C Doctor (0000-0003-1397-0092, International Civil Aviation Organization, corresponding author), James I Walsh (0000-0002-5833-1705, International Civil Aviation Organization) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 73-84 |
| Publication date | 2021-05-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The US Army War College Quarterly Parameters (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-1723 • E-ISSN: 0031-1723 |
| Publisher | United States Army War College Press (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.55540/0031-1723.3069 |
| PMID | 41244102 |
| OpenAlex | W3171238929 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 6 |
While unmanned aerial systems can serve as a force multiplier for militants, these systems do not embody a transformation in modern insurgent warfare or enable militants to engage regularly in strategic coercion. Instead, drone use is consistent with a militant group's relative capabilities and broader strategic objectives. Consequently, these groups are likely to employ drones primarily for theater and tactical military purposes
Aeronautics · Coercion (linguistics) · Computer security · Drone · Militant · Political science · Politics · Computer Science · Engineering · Law · Military History and Strategy · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |