The Proper Role of Professional Military Advice in Contemporary Uses of Force
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20138562 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Martin L Cook (0000-0002-9793-5958, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Publication date | 2002-11-10 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The US Army War College Quarterly Parameters (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-1723 • E-ISSN: 0031-1723 |
| Publisher | United States Army War College Press (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.55540/0031-1723.2115 |
| OpenAlex | W4231609751 |
| Language | EN |
ince the end of the Cold War, the use of military force in international relations has entered new moral and political territory. Increasingly, the humanitarian and human rights components of international law have emerged as a reason for the use of force. 1 Although humanitarian and human rights law experienced a considerable expansion after World War II, the filter of the Cold War rivalry largely blocked intervention based on it. Since the end of the Cold War (most clearly in Kosovo) major powers have shown a willingness to use force in the name of human rights and humanitarian concerns which trumps or overshadows more traditional understandings of the sovereign right of states over their internal affairs
Advice (programming) · Political science · Use of force · Computer Science · Defense, Military, and Policy Studies · Law · Military and Defense Studies · Military History and Strategy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|