JDN 2-19
Hitting the Target but Missing the Mark
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20139456 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ann Mezzell (corresponding author), J Wesley Hutto (0000-0003-3824-2200) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2021-05-18 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The US Army War College Quarterly Parameters (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-1723 • E-ISSN: 0031-1723 |
| Publisher | United States Army War College Press (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.55540/0031-1723.3070 |
| OpenAlex | W3170183425 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 5 |
Predoctrinal deliberations about the employment of the US armed forces, captured in Joint Doctrine Notes, remain critically understudied. Using comparative text analysis, this article identifies changes in recent Joint Doctrine Note depictions of military strategy. These changes risk distorting the logic of military strategy, sacrificing means-ends integration to organizational impulse, and raising the prospect of future shortfalls in US strategic effectiveness
Doctrine · Grand strategy · Joint (building) · Law and economics · Military doctrine · Military strategy · Political science · Sociology · Engineering · Law · Military and Defense Studies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|