Rethinking Female Urinary Devices for the US Army
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20139683 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Andrea M Peters (corresponding author), Michael Washington (0000-0003-0959-5023), Michael A Washington, Lolita Burrell, Lolita M Burrell (0000-0003-3472-523X), James Ness, James W Ness |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 41-56 |
| Publication date | 2022-03-09 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The US Army War College Quarterly Parameters (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-1723 • E-ISSN: 0031-1723 |
| Publisher | United States Army War College Press (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.55540/0031-1723.3128 |
| OpenAlex | W4221098386 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
As women assume more combat roles in the US military and continue to operate in austere environments with varied mission sets, the Department of Defense must rethink its approach to equipment and uniform development to accommodate female anatomical differences. This article analyzes the results of a study conducted during the Sandhurst Military Skills Competition at the United States Military Academy to determine the effectiveness of commercial off-the-shelf products the Army has adopted to aid female urination—products used by competition participants that may not be the best or healthiest options for women
Competition (biology) · Economics · Management · Military personnel · Political science · Public relations · Engineering · Law · Occupational Health and Performance
| Highly cited | No |
|---|