Externalized Migration Governance and the Limits of Sovereignty
The Case of Partnership Agreements between EU and Libya
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20142017 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Elin Palm (0000-0003-1653-3357, Linköping University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 86 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 9-27 |
| Publication date | 2020-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Theoria (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0040-5825 • E-ISSN: 1755-2567 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/theo.12224 |
| OpenAlex | W3006949589 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 31 |
Can state sovereignty justify privileged receiving countries exercising authority over non‐members in a third country to safeguard their own interests? Under the current migration governance of the EU, state sovereignty is manifested in migrant interdiction, interception and detention policies employed to prevent unauthorized migrants from reaching the EU, and even from attempting to embark on cross‐Mediterranean journeys. While reinforcement of the Schengen region's external borders is a key aim of the EU's internal migration politics, collaboration with third countries regarding migration control has, in the last decade, become a key feature of its external migration policy. In close collaboration with third countries, the EU has managed to curb the outflux of migrants from transit and sending countries. In effect, irregular migrants are prevented from exiting as well as from entering. This article explores the justifiability of such practices, by questioning commonly invoked models of justification such as the sovereignty “model”, with a special focus on partnership agreements regarding migration control between the EU and Libya
Business · Corporate governance · Economic geography · Economics · European union · General partnership · Geography · Interdiction · International trade · Irregular migration · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sovereignty · State (computer science) · European Criminal Justice and Data Protection · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Law · Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Externalization and Securitization as Policy Responses to African Migration to the European Union
Ukrainian Refugees’ Differentiated Treatment
Disability, Rehabilitation, and Assistive Technologies for Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Italy
Navigating the Contradictory Politics of being a Marginalised Migrant during Covid-19
Legitimacy at sea. Authority and extraterritorial border controls
A Liberal Theory of International Justice
Liberty before Liberalism
On the People's Terms
National Responsibility and Global Justice
Debating the Ethics of Immigration
Is There a Right to Immigrate
Refugees and the Ethics of Forced Displacement
Access to Asylum
Republicanism
Europe’s Migration Agreements with Migrant‐Sending Countries in the Global South
The Impact of Externalization of Migration Controls on the Rights of Asylum Seekers and Other Migrants
How Robust Refugee Protection Policies Can Strengthen Human and National Security
Domination and migration
Sovereignty and Inequality
Revisiting Extraterritorial Jurisdiction
Non-Refoulement and Extraterritorial Jurisdiction
Beyond the Sovereign State
The Politics of European Union Migration Governance
Spheres of Justice
Democratic Theory and Border Coercion
Neo‐republicanism, Old Imperialism, and Migration Ethics
The territorial trap
Beyond the borders
The 'external dimension' of EU immigration and asylum policy
International migration
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,83 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2025 (6) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |