That's Outrageous

I show how non‐presentists ought to respond to a popular objection originally due to A rthur P rior and lately updated by D ean Z immerman. P rior and Z immerman say that non‐presentism cannot account for the fittingness of certain emotional responses to things past. But presentism gains no advantage here, because it is equally incapable of accounting for the fittingness of certain other emotional responses to things past, in particular moral outrage

Compatibilism · Determinism · Epistemology · Outrage · Political science · Presentism · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

• The Personalized A-Theory of Time and Perspective

  Open Access•Vincent Conitzer•dialectica•2020

  Incluir item

• On feeling relieved that something is over

  Open Access•Gabrielly Merlo•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2025

  Incluir item

• Four-Dimensionalism

  Theodore Sider•Four-dimensionalism•2001

  Incluir item

• Thank Goodness that's Over

  Open Access•A N Prior•Philosophy•1959

  Incluir item

• A Defense of Presentism

  Ned Markosian•Oxford studies in metaphysics•2004

  Incluir item