Disagreement and Conflict
How Moral and Taste Judgements Do Not Differ
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20142312 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Giulio Pietroiusti (0000-0001-5723-5909, University of Barcelona Spain, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 87 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 837-846 |
| Publication date | 2021-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Theoria (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0040-5825 • E-ISSN: 1755-2567 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/theo.12296 |
| OpenAlex | W3097867901 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 16 |
Eriksson thinks that moral disagreements are intuitively faulty whereas disagreements about taste are intuitively faultless. He attempts to account for this difference by arguing, first, that moral judgements and taste judgements differ with regard to the presence of a disposition to challenge conflicting judgements and, second, that the intuition that a judgement is mistaken consists in the disposition to challenge it. In this article, I focus on the reasons given to support the first claim and argue that they are not sufficient. First, I assess the thesis that a taste judgement is only contingently connected with a disposition to challenge conflicting judgements. Second, I focus on the claim that a moral judgement is in part a disposition to challenge conflicting judgements. In both cases, I argue that the reasons given fail to disclose any substantial difference between the two domains
Disposition · Epistemology · Focus (optics) · Intuition · Judgement · Taste · Free Will and Agency · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.25 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2022 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |