Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Normative Force of Logical and Probabilistic Reasoning in Improving Beliefs

Bibliographic Data

ID20142314
AuthorsCorina Strößner (0000-0001-9464-5114, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume85
Issue6
Pages435-458
Publication date2019-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTheoria (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0040-5825 • E-ISSN: 1755-2567
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/theo.12214
OpenAlexW2994662197
LanguageEN
References cited27

There is a deep tension between logical and probabilistic norms of belief. This article illustrates the normative force that is associated with these frameworks by showing how rather unrestricted belief bases can be improved by undergoing logical and probabilistic reflection. It is argued that probabilistic reasoning accounts for the reliability of the conclusions one can draw from the beliefs. Most importantly, reliability commands us to care for the increasing uncertainty of conjunctions of beliefs. Deductive logic captures the agent's commitment towards all conclusions of her beliefs. In other words, it seems that commitment forces the agent to believe conclusions, which reliability tells her to view with scepticism. This conflict is resolved by arguing that commitment merely forces the agent to find the logical conclusions of her beliefs acceptable, not necessarily to believe them. This demands consistency but no deductive closure. Furthermore, it is shown that by restoring consistency, a straightforward connection between high subjective probability and full belief is undermined. Finally, the article delineates how this approach deals with the lottery paradox and the preface paradox

Belief revision · Consistency (knowledge bases) · Epistemology · Normative · Probabilistic argumentation · Probabilistic logic · Reliability (semiconductor) · Skepticism · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Psychology

  • The Fixation of Belief and its Undoing

    Open Access•Isaac Levi•Fixation of Belief and Its Undoing•1991

  • The Laws of Belief

    Willfried Spohn, Wolfgang Spohn•Laws of Belief•2012

  • The Stability of Belief

    Hannes Leitgeb•The Stability of Belief•2017

  • Putting Logic in its Place

    David Christensen•PUTTING LOGIC IN ITS PLACE:…•2004

  • Betting on Theories

    Open Access•Patrick Maher•Betting on Theories•1993

  • Belief, credence, and norms

    Open Access•Lara Buchak•Philosophical Studies•2014

  • Belief and Acceptance

    L Jonathan Cohen, Larry Cohen•Mind•1989

  • Belief is weak

    Open Access•John Hawthorne, Daniel Rothschild et al.•Philosophical Studies•2016

  • The paradox of the preface

    David Makinson, D C Makinson•Analysis•1965

  • A Dialogical, Multi-Agent Account of the Normativity of Logic

    Open Access•Catarina Dutilh Novaes•dialectica•2015

  • Against Deductive Closure

    Open Access•Paul D Thorn•Theoria•2017

  • From Degrees of Belief to Binary Beliefs

    Franz Dietrich, Christian List et al.•The Journal of Philosophy•2018

  • How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Probability 1

    Open Access•Daniel Greco•Philosophical Perspectives•2015

  • A geo-logical solution to the lottery paradox, with applications to conditional logic

    Open Access•Hanti Lin, Kevin T Kelly•Synthese•2012

  • Medieval Obligationes as Logical Games of Consistency Maintenance

    Open Access•Catarina Dutilh Novaes•Synthese•2005

  • The Stability Theory of Belief

    Hannes Leitgeb•The Philosophical Review•2014

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae