Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Projection, Recognition, and Pictorial Diversity

Bibliographic Data

ID20142701
AuthorsAndrew Inkpin (0000-0003-0126-9979, The University of Melbourne, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume82
Issue1
Pages32-55
Publication date2016-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTheoria (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0040-5825 • E-ISSN: 1755-2567
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/theo.12074
OpenAlexW1498877894
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited16

This article focuses on the difficulty for a general theory of depiction of providing a notion of pictorial content that accommodates the full diversity of picture types. The article begins by introducing two basic models of pictorial content using paradigmatic positions that maximize the ability of the respective models to deal with pictorial diversity. K ulvicki's O n I mages is interpreted as a generalized projection‐based model which proposes a scene‐centred notion of pictorial content. By contrast, L opes's aspect‐recognition theory, in U nderstanding P ictures , is taken to exemplify a recognition‐based model of pictorial content. It is then considered how applicable these two notions of pictorial content are to a spectrum of different picture types (e.g., photography, painting, caricature), highlighting differences between mechanically produced and “freehand” pictures. It is shown that while the projection‐based and recognition‐based models are each required for some picture types, neither model can be applied over the whole spectrum of diverse picture types. This, it is argued, has the far‐reaching consequence that neither the projection model nor the recognition model, nor any unitary combination of the two, can provide the basis for a theory of depiction applying to all pictures

Algorithm · Art · Computer vision · Content (measure theory) · Depiction · Diversity (politics) · Painting · Pattern recognition (psychology) · Photography · Projection (relational algebra) · Sociology · Unitary state · Visual arts · Aesthetic Perception and Analysis · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Mathematics · Photography and Visual Culture · Visual Culture and Art Theory

  • Merleau-Ponty’s ‘sensible ideas’ and embodied-embedded practice

    Open Access•Andrew Inkpin•Phenomenology and the Cognitive…•2023

  • Deeper into Pictures

    Open Access•Flint Schier•Deeper into Pictures•1986

  • Images and understanding

    Olivier Hekster•Commodus•2002

  • Languages of Art

    Nelson Goodman•Languages of Art•1976

  • Picture, Image and Experience

    Sonia Sedivy, Robert Hopkins•The Philosophical Review•2001

  • Depiction

    Christopher Peacocke•The Philosophical Review•1987

  • Part of What a Picture Is

    Kent Bach•The British Journal of Aesthetics•1970

  • On Information Available in Pictures

    E H Gombrich, Rudolf Arnheim et al.•Leonardo•1971

  • The Information Available in Pictures

    James J Gibson•Leonardo•1971

  • Transparent Pictures

    Kendall L Walton•Critical Inquiry•1984

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae