Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Bullshit, Pseudoscience and Pseudophilosophy

Bibliographic Data

ID20143152
AuthorsVictor Moberger (0000-0001-7842-0900, Stockholm University Sweden, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume86
Issue5
Pages595-611
Publication date2020-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTheoria (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0040-5825 • E-ISSN: 1755-2567
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/theo.12271
OpenAlexW3080868409
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited7

In this article I give a unified account of three phenomena: bullshit , pseudoscience and pseudophilosophy . My aims are partly conceptual, partly evaluative. Drawing on Harry Frankfurt's seminal analysis of bullshit, I give an account of the three phenomena and of how they are related, and I use this account to explain what is bad about all three. More specifically, I argue that what is defective about pseudoscience and pseudophilosophy is precisely that they are special cases of bullshit. Apart from raising interesting philosophical issues, gaining a clearer understanding of these phenomena is also of practical importance, in that it bears on how best to tackle the threat that they pose

Epistemology · Pseudoscience · Raising (metalworking) · Sociology · Emotions and Moral Behavior · Mathematics · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Philosophy · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

  • Sven Ove Hansson, Ciência E Pseudociência; Tradução De Cristiane Xerez Barroso

    Cristiane Xerez Barroso, Cristiane Xerez Barroso Cristiane Xerez Barroso•ARARIPE — REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA•2023

  • What's Wrong with Bullshit

    Open Access•Florian Cova•Ergo an Open Access Journal of…•2024

  • Ad Hoc Hipotezlerin Bilimdeki Rolü

    Open Access•Alper Bilgehan Yardımcı, Selin Güleroğlu•Felsefe Dünyası•2025

  • The pseudoscience case consensus

    Open Access•Kåre Letrud, Svein Åge Kjøs Johnsen•Philosophical Psychology•2026

  • Attacking a Straw Man? A theoretical alternative and an exploratory empirical approach on how to “inoculate” students against astrology

    Open Access•Valeria Edelsztein, Pablo Ramos Méndez et al.•Science & Education•2025

  • So much weak and inconclusive reasoning”

    Andrew Wells•Global Intellectual History•2022

  • Se le lettere e la dottrina frutta mai nulla, ciò è in virtù non della verità, ma dell’impostura”. Sulla fertilità concettuale e altri aspetti rivelatori delle Bullshit come Dissoi Logoi

    Open Access•Simone Bernardi della Rosa•European Journal of Pragmatism…•2023

  • On bullshit and lies

    Irati Zubia Landa•Intercultural Pragmatics•2025

  • How Well‐Defined Is Pseudophilosophy

    Open Access•Sven Ove Hansson•Theoria•2025

  • How Obscurantism Differs from Bullshit

    Open Access•Eric Nenkia Bien•Theoria•2021

  • Why homoeopathy is pseudoscience

    Open Access•Nikil Mukerji, Edzard Ernst•Synthese•2022

  • Freud, bullshit, and pseudoscience

    Open Access•Michael T Michael•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2024

  • Why not everyone can afford to be a bullshitter

    Open Access•Irati Zubia Landa•The Philosophical Quarterly•2025

  • Conjectures and Refutations

    Karl Popper, Melitta Mew et al.•Conjectures and Refutations•2014

  • Conjectures and Refutations

    Karl R Popper, George E Hudson•Physics Today•1963

  • The Dark Side of the Loon. Explaining the Temptations of Obscurantism

    Open Access•Filip Buekens, Maarten Boudry•Theoria•2015

  • Hard and Soft Obscurantism in the Humanities and Social Sciences

    Open Access•Jon Elster•Diogenes•2011

Unique citing works13
Citations per year2,6
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 13

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae