Can the deconstructive tour (surprisingly) translate Us anywhere
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20156424 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Raphael Gamaroff (University of Fort Hare, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1997 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 3-4 |
| Pages | 379-394 |
| Publication date | 1997-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Literary Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0256-4718 • E-ISSN: 1753-5387 |
| Publisher | Unisa Press (PUBLISHER • ZA) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02564719708530179 |
| OpenAlex | W1971550289 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 13 |
Jacques Derrida's writing begets monumental problems, and also possibilities, for translation/interpretation/communication, which are central problems in linguistics, literature and philosophy. It is playfully argued (the feu continues to enrage serious writers) that translation/interpretation/communication is the detour, the exile, the abusage, the death of (m)Other. Using an error made by Derrida, the Tourney twists through the detours of confusion between rhetorical excursions and philosophical discourse: of Babel. It is this confusion which is the imaginative playground of deconstruction, where every loss is always aGAIN
Art · Confusion · Différance · Epistemology · Linguistics · Literature · Metaphysics · Psychoanalysis · Rhetoric · Rhetorical device · Rhetorical question · Digital Media and Philosophy · Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism · Political Theology and Sovereignty · Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |