How Officials Use Intelligence Analysis
A Situational Theory
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20184680 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jane Margolis (corresponding author), J Eli Margolis |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 404-433 |
| Publication date | 2025-04-03 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0885-0607 • E-ISSN: 1521-0561 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/08850607.2024.2317755 |
| OpenAlex | W4394711548 |
| Language | EN |
What explains variation in how officials use intelligence analysis? How can one official acting on one issue within one bureaucratic and political reality seem alternately to use, misuse, and not use analysis at different times? This article proposes an answer by introducing a new theory and evaluating it with a plausibility probe centered on Robert McNamara’s experiences during the Vietnam War. The theory claims that officials use analysis adaptively to meet situational needs. It builds on research into the psychology of mindsets, emotions, and information processing to specify mechanisms of situational patterns of use—an account with marked implications for research and practice
Business · Computer security · Intelligence analysis · Situation analysis · Situational ethics · Computer Science · Intelligence, Security, War Strategy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Marketing
| Highly cited | No |
|---|