Cyber Actions by State Actors
Motivation and Utility
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20185659 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Aaron Brantly (0000-0003-4193-3985, corresponding author), Aaron F Brantly |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 465-484 |
| Publication date | 2014-09-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0885-0607 • E-ISSN: 1521-0561 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/08850607.2014.900291 |
| OpenAlex | W2031789908 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 11 |
Covert action is as old as political man. The subversive manipulation of others is nothing new. It has been written about since Sun Tzu and Kautilya. People and nations have always sought the use of shadowy means to influence situations and events. Covert action is and has been a staple of the state system. A dark and nefarious tool often banished to philosophical and intellectual exile, covert action is in truth an oft-used method of achieving utility that is frequently overlooked by academics. Modern scholars contend that, for utility to be achieved, activities such as war and diplomacy must be conducted transparently. Examined here is the construction of utility for a subset of covert action: cyber attacks
Foreign policy · International relations · Library science · Management · Middle East · National security · Political science · Politics · Strategic studies · Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · Intelligence, Security, War Strategy · Law · Public Administration
| Citations per year | 0.86 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Highly cited | No |