Ethics in Practice
A Pragmatist Approach to Intelligence
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20185742 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Francesco Margoni (0000-0002-8109-228X, Deakin University), Giangiuseppe Pili (0000-0002-7360-6826, University of Stavanger), JULES GASPARD (University of Warwick), Jules J S Gaspard |
| Year | 2025 |
| Pages | 1-32 |
| Publication date | 2025-07-23 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0885-0607 • E-ISSN: 1521-0561 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/08850607.2025.2527100 |
| OpenAlex | W4412605133 |
| Language | EN |
This article offers a new approach to intelligence ethics grounded in practice. Drawing on pragmatist ethics and a survey of intelligence professionals, we analyze how practitioners resolve moral dilemmas. Three findings stand out: legal deference often replaces ethical reasoning; analysts prioritize special obligations over general moral principles, especially familial ties; and, despite its prominence, the language of just intelligence is absent from practitioner responses. These results point to a gap between theoretical ethical frameworks and lived ethical reasoning in intelligence work. Rather than impose new rules, we highlight a form of ethical reasoning already in use—situated, context sensitive, and empirical. This pragmatist lens, we argue, better captures the complexities of ethical judgment in intelligence practice
Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Intelligence analysis · Political science · Pragmatism · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Educational and Psychological Assessments · Engineering · Law · Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function · Philosophy · Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |