Superfluous Labor

Bibliographic Data

ID20193609
AuthorsAnonymous Anonymous (0009-0007-5624-1945, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume35
Issue1
Pages121-163
Publication date2026-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueQui Parle (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1041-8385 • E-ISSN: 1938-8020
PublisherDuke University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1215/10418385-12358618
OpenAlexW7165672809
LanguageEN
References cited48

No one following the critical academic study of Palestine and Israel over the past decade and a half could fail to observe the dramatic proliferation of the category of settler colonialism. This article examines the intellectual historical conceit of one prominent strand, those studies taking after Patrick Wolfe’s influential theorization. Where many scholars observe a renewal or return to an earlier tradition of studying Zionism, the author argues that recent developments represent a paradigmatic turn. This is, moreover, often a highly “motivated” interpretation that aims for the history to adhere to the preferred theoretical schema (specifically, the superfluity of native labor to the settler economy), rather than striving to incorporate the unfolding of a dynamic struggle and its contemporary analysis. To demonstrate this shortcoming, the article then samples a selection of English- and Arabic-language sources from the apparent interim in the theorization of Zionist settler colonialism. These works, responsive to their conjuncture between the June War and the First Intifada, not only deploy many concepts and theories that are illegible in the Wolfean paradigm but also demonstrate a concerted recovery of the history and struggles of the Palestinian working class and their relevance to the struggle for national liberation

Intellectual history · Interim · Palestine · Agricultural and Environmental Management · Belt and Road Initiative · Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies

Tools

Open DOI