Equity and public finance issues in the state subsidy of public transit
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20201047 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nancy Hudspeth (California State University, Stanislaus), Gerard Wellman (California State University, Stanislaus) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 135-155 |
| Publication date | 2018-06-04 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1096-3367 • E-ISSN: 1945-1814 |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/jpbafm-02-2018-0014 |
| OpenAlex | W2808692621 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 32 |
Purpose Public transit is an essential service for people without access to an automobile, particularly those who are low income, elderly, or with disabilities. Previous research has found that large urban transit agencies receive less state funding per ride provided than suburban agencies. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach Using data from the National Transit Database for 37 of the largest US transit agencies, the authors create a panel data set of services provided and sources of operating funds for the period 1991-2009. The authors develop an equity index that represents the difference between the share of state funding that an agency receives and the share of the total transit rides in the state that it provides. The authors use fixed-effects regression modeling to examine the determinants of fiscal balance and the equity index. Findings The authors find that the share of an agency’s operating funds that come from dedicated taxes is a significant predictor of fiscal health as measured by its fiscal balance; reliance on passenger fares and provision of bus service are significant predictors of operating deficits. The equity index finds that large agencies receive less than their fair share of state transit funding based on ridership. Practical implications Dedicated tax revenues are a key ingredient to transit agencies’ fiscal stability. Transit agencies’ fiscal condition in states and localities that do not have a dedicated tax could benefit from such a tax. Social implications Transit is an essential service for people who are unable to drive or own an automobile; funding inequities maintain old patterns of segregation and isolation for “transit dependents.” Originality/value This study supports earlier research finding that large agencies receive less than their fair share of state funding based on ridership. It contributes to the literature on transportation equity and transit finance
Business · Economics · Political science · Public economics · Public transport · Revenue · Subsidy · Transport engineering · Engineering · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Transportation Planning and Optimization · Urban Transport and Accessibility · Finance
City Money. Political Processes, Fiscal Strain, and Retrenchment
Applying Value Capture in the Seattle Region
Just pricing
Land value capture finance for transport accessibility
Transit Paradise Lost
Protecting the Public Interest in Long-Term Concession Agreements for Transportation Infrastructure
Rural accessibility, social inclusion and social justice
Urban Transport Priorities
Private Provision of Public Infrastructure
The U.S. car colossus and the production of inequality
Assessing and Measuring the Fiscal Heath of Local Governments
The Ambiguities and Limits of Fiscal Strain Indicators
| Highly cited | No |
|---|