Self-selection bias or decision inertia? Explaining the municipal bond “competitive sale dilemma”

Purpose Although most empirical studies find that competitive bidding can reduce the interest cost, the municipal bond primary market is dominated by negotiating offerings. The purpose of this paper is to investigate this dilemma by empirically testing two hypotheses: self-selection bias and decision inertia hypotheses. Design/methodology/approach Logistic regressions and Heckman procedures are used to examine data from the California municipal bond primary market. Findings The paper finds that while information asymmetry does affect the selection of underwriting approach, self-selection bias cannot explain the cost difference between the two sale approaches. On the other hand, decision inertia has the highest explanatory power in the selection of sale approaches. Originality/value This paper provides a new explanation for the “competitive sale dilemma” from the perspective of decision inertia. The authors document that state and local governments show a greater propensity of adhering to previous choices, particularly in a context in which the outcome is uncertain or actors have little knowledge in comparing the outcome of the alternatives

Actuarial science · Bidding · Dilemma · Economics · Microeconomics · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Housing Market and Economics

• From Relational Stability to Network Resilience

  Open Access•Kun Huang, Gao Liu et al.•The American Review of Public…•2025

  Incluir item

• A meta‐analysis of the state and local government borrowing costs

  Open Access•Ed Gerrish, Mikhail Ivonchyk et al.•Public Administration Review•2024

  Incluir item

• Cutting off the fiscal nose

  Travis Roach, Mariya Burdina•Local Government Studies•2025

  Incluir item

• Statistical Analysis With Missing Data

  Maureen Lahiff, Roderick J A Little et al.•Journal of the American…•1989

  Incluir item

• Status quo bias in decision making

  Open Access•William Samuelson, Richard Zeckhauser•Journal of Risk and Uncertainty•1988

  Incluir item

• Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error

  James J Heckman•Econometrica•1979

  Incluir item

• Models of Man

  Open Access•Martin Hollis•Models of Man•1977

  Incluir item

• A Study of the Effects of Competition in the Tax-exempt Bond Market

  Reuben A Kessel, Reuben Kessel•Journal of Political Economy•1971

  Incluir item

• "The Science of "Muddling Through

  Charles E Lindblom•Public Administration Review•1959

  Incluir item

• The Influence of Jurisdiction Size and Sale Type on Municipal Bond Interest Rates

  Open Access•Bill Simonsen, Mark D Robbins et al.•Public Administration Review•2001

  Incluir item

• Does It Make Any Difference Anymore? Competitive versus Negotiated Municipal Bond Issuance

  William Simonsen, Mark D Robbins•Public Administration Review•1996

  Incluir item

• Structural Inertia and Organizational Change

  Michael T Hannan, John Freeman•American Sociological Review•1984

  Incluir item

• Organizational Evolution in a Multinational Context

  Michael T Hannan, Glenn R Carroll et al.•American Sociological Review•1995

  Incluir item

• The social space and the genesis of groups

  Open Access•Pierre Bourdieu•Social Science Information•1985

  Incluir item