Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Understanding collaboration beyond contracting

The relationship between inter-organizational collaboration and hard/soft control

Bibliographic Data

ID20201404
AuthorsKristina Frid (0009-0000-3775-6600, Lund University, corresponding author), Elin K Funck (0000-0001-6307-9834, Lund University), Anna Glenngård (0000-0001-7500-4610, Lund University)
Year2024
Volume36
Issue6
Pages47-71
Publication date2024-12-16
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1096-3367 • E-ISSN: 1945-1814
PublisherEmerald (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1108/jpbafm-06-2023-0086
OpenAlexW4401525334
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited46

Purpose This paper aims to extend insights about the relationship between inter-organizational collaboration and approaches to control from the perspective of decision-makers. We investigate the relationship between approaches to control and intended forms of integration between actors responsible for solving the complex problem of integrated person-centered care for elderly with diverse and significant needs. Design/methodology/approach The empirical study is based on a content analysis of contractual agreements. We have analyzed a total of 118 collaboration agreements and associative documents between all Swedish regions and municipalities. Findings The study shows that intended integration is subject to remarkable variation in intended forms of inter-organizational collaboration in this Swedish case. The paper illustrates that decision-makers’ intentions with proposed collaboration in each given context are important for the chosen approach to control. Regardless of intended forms of integration, our study suggests that an imminent soft approach to control is expressed alongside limited signs of hard control. Various forms of intended integration can be managed by the two approaches simultaneously insofar as the agreements appear to have a two-sided purpose. Originality/value Our paper proposes an empirically driven taxonomy of intended forms of integration initiatives. The taxonomy provides resources for studies about how collaboration can be managed when it is stipulated by national legislation but local self-governance gives actors considerable freedom to decide on how to organize and manage services. By presenting the taxonomy and relating this to approaches of control, our iterative study builds on and adds to a recent stream of research arguing that the relationship between collaboration and approaches to control may by fuzzier and more complex than originally thought

Business · Corporate governance · Knowledge management · Legislation · Management science · Originality · Political science · Process management · Qualitative research · Sociology · Computer Science · Engineering · Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Public Policy and Administration Research · Artificial Intelligence

  • Implications of multiprofessional collaboration in primary care – benefits for all? A quantitative study of effects on resource utilization of a team-based primary care practice in Sweden

    Open Access•Anna Glenngård, Mattias Haraldsson•Health Policy•2025

  • On the Theory and Practice of Transformational Collaboration

    Arthur Turovh Himmelman•Creating Collaborative Advantage•1996

  • Collaboration and Collaborative Advantage

    Chris Huxham•Creating Collaborative Advantage•1996

  • The New Public Governance?

    Erik Hans Klijn, Stephen P Osborne•The new public governance•2010

  • Integration and collaboration in public health—a conceptual framework

    Open Access•Runo Axelsson, Susanna Bihari Axelsson•The International Journal of…•2006

  • Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?

    Open Access•Laura Poppo, Todd Zenger•Strategic Management Journal•2002

  • The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration

    Danielle D’amour, Danielle D'Amour et al.•Journal of Interprofessional Care•2005

  • Implementing collaborative governance

    Carmine Bianchi, Greta Nasi et al.•Public Management Review•2021

  • Managing the performance of healthcare networks

    Open Access•Jenna M Evans, Elana Commisso et al.•Public Management Review•2024

  • Network governance and collaborative governance

    Open Access•Huanming Wang, Bing Ran•Public Management Review•2023

  • Cross-sector collaboration formality

    Zachary Bauer, Khaldoun Abouassi et al.•Public Management Review•2022

  • Performance management and hybridization of healthcare – case of the accountable care organization

    Open Access•Petra Kokko, Harri Laihonen•Journal of Public Budgeting…•2022

  • Enacting “accountability in collaborative governance”

    Open Access•Kelum Jayasinghe, Christine M Kenney et al.•Journal of Public Budgeting…•2020

  • In control we trust!? Exploring formal control configurations for municipally owned corporations

    Open Access•Tobias Krause, Tobias Alexander Krause et al.•Journal of Public Budgeting…•2021

  • (Re)descriptions of medical professional work

    Open Access•Cemil Eren Fırtın, Tom Karlsson•Journal of Public Budgeting…•2020

  • The Road to Hell

    Sim B Sitkin, Darryl Stickel•Trust in Organizations•1996

  • Developing Purpose-Oriented Networks

    Open Access•Olivier Berthod, Federica Segato•Perspectives on Public Management…•2019

  • Evaluation Systems

    Open Access•Frans L Leeuw, Jan-Eric Furubo•Evaluation•2008

  • Designing and Implementing Cross‐Sector Collaborations

    Open Access•John M Bryson, Barbara C Crosby et al.•Public Administration Review•2015

  • Theorizing Hybridity

    Open Access•Chris Skelcher, Steven Rathgeb Smith•Public Administration•2014

  • Beyond the Contract

    Open Access•Beth Gazley•Public Administration Review•2008

  • The Tangled Web

    Vangen, Siv Vangen et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2012

  • When Tensions Become Opportunities

    Open Access•Seulki Lee•Journal of Public Administration…•2022

  • Big Questions in Public Network Management Research

    Robert Agranoff, M Mcguire et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2001

  • Informal Accountability in Multisector Service Delivery Collaborations

    Barbara S Romzek, B Romzek et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2014

  • Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice

    Christopher Ansell, Chris Ansell et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2007

  • Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis

    Open Access•Hsiu-Fang Hsieh, Sarah E Shannon•Qualitative Health Research•2005

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae