Governmental purchasing in the public policy process
Orienting theory and practice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20201501 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Thomas A P Sinclair (Binghamton University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 291-306 |
| Publication date | 2000-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1096-3367 • E-ISSN: 1945-1814 |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/jpbafm-12-02-2000-b006 |
| OpenAlex | W2404721148 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 7 |
What do purchasing officers and policy theorists have to offer one another? Policy frameworks could help purchasing officers anticipate or predict change and respond to those changes earlier and more effectively. Likewise, purchasing officers and the study of the governmental purchasing systems they operate could contribute a great deal to the development of policy theories or frameworks. This paper outlines the central features of two important policy frameworks; institutional analysis and development (IAD) within the tradition of institutional rational choice (Ostrom, 1999), and the advocacy-coalition framework (Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith, 1999) and applies those frameworks to the government purchasing arena
Business · Economic growth · Economics · Political science · Public economics · Public policy · Purchasing · Computer Science · Local Government Finance and Decentralization · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research · Public Procurement and Policy · Marketing
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |