Going Gagas for due process

Purpose The US federal government requires auditors to follow governmental auditing standards when performing audits of entities expending significant federal government dollars. This study explores stakeholder participation during the comment letter phase of government auditing standard setting to determine if participation is symbolic or substantive. Design/methodology/approach Researchers conduct an analysis of the 179 comment letters submitted to the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) and received for their 2010 and 2017 exposure drafts of government auditing standards. Findings The distribution of stakeholder participation groups in the government auditing standard-setting process differs from the distribution in the private company auditing standard-setting process. On average, participants submit letters that are greater than two pages in length. Participants also contribute feedback on topics that the GAO directly solicits. Taken together, the results demonstrate stakeholder behaviors that are consistent with a substantive rather than symbolic due process involvement for government auditing standards. Research limitations/implications Stakeholder beliefs are inferred based on the observed behavior of comment letter submissions. Also, there is a subjective element to the classification of the comment letters for the study. Practical Implications Given the far-reaching implications of Yellow Book auditing standards on public, private and nonprofit entities, the findings are relevant to a heterogeneous audience. This study reveals opportunities for users of government auditing standards, practitioners and academics for greater involvement in due process standard setting to bring additional legitimacy to the GAO and its standard-setting activities. Originality/value Beyond the current study, little empirical research examines Yellow Book auditing standards or the due process through which these standards are established. This is the first study to examine the complete set of comment letters for the 2010 and 2017 exposure drafts of government auditing standards

Accountability · Audit · Business · Legitimacy · Originality · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Stakeholder · Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance · Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting · Law · Public Policy and Administration Research · Accounting

• Leave it in! Analyzing the responses to a proposal to remove governmental accounting from the certified public accountant examination

  Open Access•Renee Flasher, Lydia Didia et al.•Journal of Public Budgeting…•2023

  Add to list

• Stakeholder participation in the governmental accounting standard-setting process

  Open Access•Linda Kidwell, Linda A Kidwell et al.•Journal of Public Budgeting…•2018

  Add to list

• Institutionalized Organizations

  J W Meyer, Brian Rowan•American Journal of Sociology•1977

  Add to list