The role of survey research in the benchmarking process
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 20201693 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Michael W Link, Michael Link (University of South Carolina), Robert W Oldendick (University of South Carolina) |
| Ano | 2000 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 138-164 |
| Data de publicação | 2000-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1096-3367 • E-ISSN: 1945-1814 |
| Editora | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/jpbafm-12-01-2000-b007 |
| OpenAlex | W2772459678 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 3 |
| Referências citadas | 26 |
As more state and local governments and agencies embrace strategic planning as a means of cost control, accountability, and goal achievement, the process of benchmarking has become increasingly important. This article examines the role survey research can play in the benchmarking process. The authors focus on some of the considerations and controversies involved in this process, including questionnaire design (What types of questions should be included?), population definition (Who should be included and how can these individuals be identified?), sampling procedures (What methods of sampling should be employed to ensure that the data are representative of the population of interest?), data collection methods (Should surveys be conducted via mail, face-to-face, or telephone?), and data analysis (How can the survey data help state and local officials evaluate their service delivery?)
Accountability · Benchmarking · Business · Data collection · Environmental health · Political science · Population · Process management · Service delivery framework · Sociology · Survey methodology · Accounting and Organizational Management · Computer Science · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Medicine · Public Policy and Administration Research · Marketing
Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys
Community-Relevant Measurement of Quality of Life
Neighborhood Evaluation of Local Government Services
In Defense of Citizen Evaluations as Performance Measures
There's a Madness in the Method
Explaining Citizen Evaluations of Urban Services
Total Quality Management in Government
Designing Effective Performance-Measurement Systems under the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993
Citizen Responses to Dissatisfaction in Urban Communities
Standards of Excellence
Urban Policy Making and Subjective Service Evaluations
Citizen Satisfaction with Local Governance
Attitudes and Belief Systems Concerning Urban Services
Pseudo-Opinions on Public Affairs
"What Must My Interest in Politics Be If I Just Told You "I Don't Know
Linking Objective and Subjective Measures of Performance
Citizen Satisfaction with Urban Services
Subjective and Objective Measures of Police Service Delivery
Putting Teeth into the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Public Services
In Defense of Surveys as a Reliable Source of Evaluation Data
Implementing Performance Monitoring
Institutionalized Use of Citizen Surveys in the Budgetary and Policy-Making Processes
The "Quality of Life" and Social Indicators Research
Survey Research for Public Administrators
Overcoming the Inadequacies of Performance Measurement in Local Government
Polls and Surveys
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,13 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2003 - 2006 (4) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 3 |