Court strategies in the appropriations process
The Oklahoma case
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20201892 |
|---|---|
| Authors | James W Douglas (0000-0003-3804-1337, University of South Carolina, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 117-136 |
| Publication date | 2002-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1096-3367 • E-ISSN: 1945-1814 |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/jpbafm-14-01-2002-b006 |
| OpenAlex | W2775131952 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 7 |
Little is known about the strategies used by state courts during the appropriations process. This article examines court budgetary practices in the state of Oklahoma. It reveals how court funding works in Oklahoma, what strategies are used by the state courts, and which factors are most important in determining the success of the courts in getting the funds they need. It shows that the judiciary is not necessarily at the mercy of the other branches of government when seeking resources. The findings provide the first glimpse at court budgeting strategies and determinants of these strategies’ success at the state level
Business · Court decision · Political science · Computer Science · Housing Market and Economics · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Public Administration
Agency Strategies and Executive Review
Litigation as a Budgetary Constraint
Agency Requests, Gubernatorial Support, and Budget Success in State Legislatures Revisited
Fiscal Dependency and the State Budget Process
Courts and Public Purse Strings
The Executive Budget in the States
Agency Requests, Gubernatorial Support and Budget Success in State Legislatures
| Citations per year | 0.04 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2003 - 2003 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |