Kill Skippy? Red Meat versus Kangaroo Meat in the Australian Diet
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20202111 |
|---|---|
| Authors | A Peace (0000-0002-4161-1946, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Issue | 51 |
| Publication date | 2011-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Australian Humanities Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1325-8338 • E-ISSN: 1835-8063 |
| Publisher | ANU Press (PUBLISHER • AU) |
| DOI | 10.22459/ahr.51.2011.06 |
| OpenAlex | W40229519 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 2 |
One of the less evident axioms of anthropological research is that, when significant events take place, it is as important to note the identities of those who are not present as it is to record the details of those who are. Since I have spent several years observing the social changes within a small Irish village where not attending meetings was as much a political statement as being there (Peace, A World of Fine Difference), I have come to regard this as a methodological imperative rather than an option. In a similar vein, I propose in what follows that if anthropologists aim to critically explore the politics behind specific ‘food events’ (Douglas), it is as necessary to specify which foodstuffs do not appear on the dinner table as those that do. I emphasize the influence of politics since a good deal of anthropological research into food habits details the limited relevance of nutritional considerations by contrast with the inescapable force of political ones. As is often remarked in this field of study, food is never ‘just food’ (Caplan 3)
Animal science · Biology · Red meat · White meat · Zoology · Culinary Culture and Tourism · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Indigenous Studies and Ecology · Food Science
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,31 |
| Citation span | 2013 - 2023 (11) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |