Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Verbal Disputes and Deep Conceptual Disagreements

Bibliographic Data

ID20205915
AuthorsDaniel Cohnitz (0000-0001-5958-8572, Utrecht University, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume24
Issue3
Pages279-294
Publication date2020-08-27
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTrames Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1406-0922 • E-ISSN: 1736-7514
PublisherEstonian Academy Publishers (PUBLISHER • EE)
DOI10.3176/tr.2020.3.02
OpenAlexW3082990189
LanguageEN

To say that a philosophical dispute is â merely verbalâ seems to be an important diagnosis. If that diagnosis is correct for a particular dispute, then the right thing to do would be to declare that dispute to be over. The topic of what the disputing parties were fighting over was just a pseudo-problem (thus not really a problem), or at least â if there is a sense in which also merely verbal disputes indicate some problem, for example, insufficient clarity of terminology â this problem is not substantial, or not as substantial as the disputing parties believed their problem initially to be. In this paper I will try to clarify what it means if we diagnose that two arguing parties are having a merely verbal dispute

Cognitive psychology · Cognitive science · Political science · Child and Animal Learning Development · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae