Science Fiction and the Ideological Definition of Religion
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 20206594 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jonathan Tuckett (0000-0003-2700-0580, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2017 |
| Volumen | 19 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 525-551 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2017-05-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Implicit Religion (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1463-9955 • E-ISSN: 1743-1697 |
| Editorial | Equinox Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1558/imre.31025 |
| OpenAlex | W2617625714 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
According to William Sims Bainbridge science fiction serves an ideological purpose. In this paper I take this premise and re-frame it in the terms of philosophical phenomenology of Edmund Husserl and Max Scheler to argue that science fiction promotes a “science” ideology. Specifically, it promotes a particular mode of naturalization: making the person “fit” within their life-world. It does this by using the perceived culture war between “science” and “religion” as a framing device to throw the former into sharper contrast. Contra Stephen Hrotic, I argue the changing perceptions of religion in science fiction have not become more tolerant but reflect changes in the “scientific” mode of naturalization. To demonstrate this I will look at two key case studies: James Blish’s A Case of Conscience and Mary Doria Russell’s The Sparrow
Aesthetics · Epistemology · Ideology · Naturalization · Political science · Politics · Premise · Sociology · History · Law · Media, Religion, Digital Communication · Philosophy · Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices · Violence, Religion, and Philosophy
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,11 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2017 - 2017 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |