Is there a doctor in the house? A riposte to Victor Burgin on practice-based arts and audiovisual research
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20207701 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Desmond Bell (University of Edinburgh, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 171-177 |
| Publication date | 2008-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Media Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1468-2753 • E-ISSN: 2040-0926 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1386/jmpr.9.2.171_3 |
| OpenAlex | W1985291352 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
I suggest that to properly understand current resistance within parts of the academy to practice-based doctoral programmes in the creative arts one has to understand the deeply entrenched character of the social division between intellectual and manual labour in our society. Victor Burgin's typology of doctoral candidates for visual arts programmes and tripartite structure of doctoral study is, I argue, hierarchical, privileging traditional humanities scholarship over studio-based methodologies of research
Art · Political science · Scholarship · Sociology · Studio · The arts · Typology · Visual arts · Anthropology · Artistic and Creative Research · Contemporary art, education, critique · Law · Visual Culture and Art Theory
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,17 |
| Citation span | 2008 - 2023 (16) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |