Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Towards a United South African Agriculture

A Review of Social Networking Between Black Smallholder and White Commercial Farming Communities Through Farmer Organisations

Bibliographic Data

ID20242016
AuthorsSiphe Zantsi (0000-0001-9787-3913, University of Johannesburg, corresponding author), Lunathi Hlakanyane (Stellenbosch University), Tabile Nkunjana (Stellenbosch University)
Year2022
Volume17
Issue1
Pages146-170
Publication date2022-01-02
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1753-7274 • E-ISSN: 1818-6874
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/18186874.2022.2073244
OpenAlexW4281910296
LanguageEN
References cited28

This review study takes a first step towards understanding the extent of social cohesion in South Africa’s farming landscape to contribute to the scant literature in this area. A socially cohesive society is a society in which all forms of inequality, exclusion, and disparity based on ethnicity, race, gender, class, religion or any other divisive distinction that causes distrust and conflict are sustainably reduced with a view to eventual eradication. This ideal is examined through social networking among the different farming communities within South African agriculture. Farmer organisations are identified and reviewed through their websites and discussed together with other relevant literature, searched through traditional and snowball literature reviews. We found very little evidence to suggest that the social cohesion ideal has been achieved in South African agriculture. The implications of this are discussed in light of the transformation agenda of the agricultural sector through land reform

Agriculture · Development economics · Distrust · Economic growth · Economics · Ethnic group · Geography · Inequality · Political science · Sociology · Sustainability · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Cooperative Studies and Economics · Microfinance and Financial Inclusion · Ecology

  • Digitalisation of agricultural knowledge and advice networks

    Open Access•Simon Fielke, Bruce Taylor et al.•Agricultural Systems•2020

  • Null

    Open Access•null null•Philosophy study•2016

  • Sociological Perspectives on Social Cohesion as the Principal Requirement for Social Stability

    Stanley Madonsela•Society in Transition•2017

  • What is Social Capital? A Comprehensive Review of the Concept

    Humnath Bhandari, Kumi Yasunobu•Asian journal of social science•2009

  • Re-thinking agricultural development in South Africa

    Stefan Schirmer•African Historical Review•2015

  • South Africa’s social transformation policies

    Finex Ndhlovu•Journal of Multicultural Discourses•2019

  • South Africa

    Open Access•Bill Freund•Review of African Political Economy•2007

  • Setting them up to fail

    Clemence Rusenga•Review of African Political Economy•2020

  • Elite capture and state neglect

    R Hall, Thembela Kepe•Review of African Political Economy•2017

  • Unpacking the 'Emergent Farmer' Concept in Agrarian Reform

    Open Access•Lovemore C Gwiriri, James Bennett et al.•Development and Change•2019

  • Farm Labour in South Africa

    David Rees•Social Dynamics•1978

  • Social Cohesion

    N E Friedkin•Annual Review of Sociology•2004

  • Commercial Agriculture inSouthAfrica since 1994

    Open Access•H Bernstein•Journal of Agrarian Change•2013

  • Agrarian reform and South Africa's agro-food system

    Stephen Greenberg•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2015

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae