“In the First Place, We Don’t Like to Be Called ‘Refugees’”
Dilemmas of Representation and Transversal Politics in the Participatory Art Project 100% Foreign
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20249203 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anne Ring Petersen (0000-0003-1591-8554, University of Copenhagen, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 126 |
| Publication date | 2021-12-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Humanities (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2076-0787 • E-ISSN: 2076-0787 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/h10040126 |
| OpenAlex | W4200321191 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 24 |
100% FOREIGN? (100% FREMMED?) is an art project consisting of 250 life stories of individuals who were granted asylum in Denmark between 1956 and 2019. Thus, it can be said to form a collective portrait that inserts citizens of refugee backgrounds into the narrative of the nation, thereby expanding the idea of national identity and culture. 100% FOREIGN? allows us to think of participatory art as a privileged site for the exploration of intersubjective relations and the question of how to “represent” citizens with refugee experience as well as the history and practice of asylum. The conflicting aims and perceptions involved in such representations are many, as suggested by the opening sentence of Hannah Arendt’s 1943 essay “We, Refugees”: “In the first place, we don’t like to be called ‘refugees’”. Using 100% FOREIGN? as an analytical reference point, this article discusses some of the ethical and political implications of representing former refugees. It briefly considers recent Danish immigration and asylum policies to situate the project in its regional European context and argues that, similarly to its neighbouring countries, Denmark can be described as a “postmigrant society” (Foroutan). To frame 100% FOREIGN? theoretically, this article draws on Arendt’s essay, Trinh T. Minh-ha’s concept of speaking nearby, as well as the feminist concept of transversal politics (Meskimmon, Yuval-Davis). It is hoped that this approach will lead to a deeper understanding of what participatory art can bring to the ethical politics of representing refugee experience
Aesthetics · Narrative · Political science · Politics · Refugee · Sociology · Gender Studies · Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy · History · Law · Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Philosophy
Culture War
Migration and Integration
Reading (with) Hannah Arendt
Theatre of Real People
Reframing Migration, Diversity and the Arts
Transnational Feminisms, Transversal Politics and Art
Making worlds, making subjects
The reconfiguration of publics and spaces through art
Does philosophy contribute to an invasion complex? Sloterdijk the antagonist and the agonism of Mouffe
From the cosmos to the polis
Contemporary art on the current refugee crisis
Speaking Nearby
Women, Ethnicity and Empowerment
Limitations of the Right to Have Rights
Representations of Sexuality and Race at Danish Exhibitions of “Exotic” People at the Turn of the Twentieth Century
Processional Aesthetics and Irregular Transit
Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics
Artistic Representations of Refugees
The `Exotic' as Mass Entertainment
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2024 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |